Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002712. <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />U.S. CONGRESS, <br />CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, <br />: Washington, DC, July 9, 1993. <br />Hon. GEORGE MILLER, <br />Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources, <br />Rouse of Representatives, Washington, DC. <br />DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has re- <br />viewed H.R. 631, the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993, as ordered <br />reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources on June <br />30, 1993. CBO estimates that enactment of H.R. 631 would result <br />in additional costs of $2 million to $3 million over the next five <br />years, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. Enact- <br />ment of H.R. 631 could affect direct spending by reducing offsetting <br />receipts, and therefore the bill would be subject to pay-as-you-go <br />procedures under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emer- <br />gency Deficit Control Act of 1985. We do not expect such reductions <br />in receipts to be significant. <br />H.R. 631 would designate over 611,000 acres of National Forest <br />System land and Bureau of Land Management holdings in Colo- <br />rado as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System. <br />Three additional units of federal land totaling about 155,000 acres <br />would be permanently protected under conservation plans that are <br />less restrictive than wilderness designations. Finally, the bill would <br />require the Forest Service to report on the status of private prop- <br />erty within the Spanish Peaks further planning area. <br />Based on information from the Forest Service and the Bureau of <br />Land Management, CBO estimates that costs for creating and exe- <br />cuting wilderness area management plans would total about <br />$300,000 annually. Surveying and boundary work would cost from <br />$50,000 to $250,000 per year for up to ten years. <br />The National Wilderness Preservation System Act stipulates that <br />all timber located in units of the National Wilderness Preservation <br />System is no longer available for timber harvesting. Because most <br />of the land specified in this bill is not currently available for timber <br />harvest, and much of the timber that is available would likely be <br />replaced by timber in other areas, we would not expect there to be <br />a significant reduction in timber receipts over the next five years. <br />Lands designated as wilderness are also no longer available for <br />mineral exploration and development. We expect that no significant <br />loss of mineral receipts would result from this bilI because H.R. <br />631 provides that mineral resources could be removed under valid <br />existing rights. The bill would bar new claims, but any effect of <br />that prohibition would be minor because there have been few new <br />mining claims in the affected areas in recent years. <br />Enactment of this bilI would not impose significant costs on state <br />and local governments. <br />If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased <br />to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Theresa Gullo, who can <br />be reached at 226-2860. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />ROBERT D. REISCHAUER, Director. <br />