My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09490
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:39:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.125
Description
Wild and Scenic - Colorado Wilderness Act - 1991
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
7/19/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 - 103 rd Congress - 1 st Session - A Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002G35 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />especially in Colorado and other States in the more arid regions of <br />the Nation. . . . In reporting S. 1029, as amended by the Commit- <br />tee substitute, the Committee has acted to afford the entire House <br />of Representatives an opportunity to decide what provisions should <br />be included regarding the water resources of the wilderness areas <br />designated by the bill and the rights and responsibilities of the Na- <br />tional Government with respect to proper management and protec- <br />tion of those resources." <br />On September 14, 1992, the House passed S. 1029 with further <br />revisions, including an express reservation of water with respect to <br />each wilderness designated by the bill. There followed discussions <br />between the Chairman and other Members of the Committee and <br />interested Senators, and on October 8, 1992, the Senate passed a <br />revised version of the bill that included water-related provisions re- <br />flecting these discussions; but the house took no further action <br />prior to sine die adjournment. <br />Section 8 of H.R. 631 as reported includes water-related provi- <br />sions like those passed by the Senate in October, 1992. In sum- <br />mary, its purpose is to provide protection for wilderness similar to <br />that which would result from implementation of a federal reserved <br />water right while precluding any effective assertion of such a right. <br />Its principal effects are- <br />(1) to limit the jurisdiction otherwise available to a court or <br />agency' under any Act of Congress (including the so-called <br />McCarran Amendment, 43 U.S.C. 666, which affords a waiver <br />of sovereign immunity so as to permit joinder of the United <br />States in certain State proceedings related to water rights), so <br />that there could be no consideration of any claim to water or <br />water rights involving a construction of the bill as effecting a <br />reservation to the United States of water rights with respect <br />to lands that the bill designates as wilderness; and <br />(2) to restrict the ability of any U.S. officer or employee or <br />any other person to act on behalf of the United States to assert <br />any: such claim; and <br />(3) to prevent Federal approval or assistance for new or en- <br />larged water-related facilities within wilderness areas and to <br />constrain, partly directly and partly by providing additional <br />authority for administrative actions, various water-related ac- <br />tivities that could have an adverse LlJlpact on wilderness re- <br />sources and values. <br />It should be noted that the Committee's acceptance of section 8 <br />of H.R. 631 reflects two specific factors: the fact that the lands the <br />bill designates as wilderness are solely and entirely headwaters <br />areas, and the interaction between the provisions of section 8 and <br />the State of Colorado's system for adjudication and administration <br />of water and water rights. Therefore, the favorable reporting of <br />H.R. 631 should not be read as indicating that the Committee <br />would find similar provisions adequate to protect downstream wil- <br />derness areas or headwaters wilderness areas outside Colorado. <br /> <br />THE COMMITI'EE AMENDMENTS <br /> <br />The Committee adopted a number of amendments, primarily <br />technical in nature but also including provisions related to nomen- <br />clature and to use of routes and trains in the Fossil Ridge Recre- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.