Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Foreword <br /> <br />h . h d cI Am" d . . 'fy' .. rId S 't. ... <br />As t e (Wenner century raws"Wa ose, enca 15 engage In an Intensl mg competlnon ror an . rrugg mg CInes <br />compete with mushrooming suburbs; the suburbs compere wiih open space, farms and forests; agriculture and forestry <br />compete with wildlife habitat and the last remaining places of solitude. The country's population continues ro grow. <br />Auromobiles, computers and other technologies enable us ro sptead OUt across the land, altering it as never before. <br />Meanwhile, recoiling from this "progress," many Americans incteasingly resist changes in the use of land in order to <br />protect their environment or the way of life they have come ro enjoy. . <br /> <br />j <br />.' <br />~ <br /> <br />The controversy sutrounding canle gtazing on public lands, in the Rocky Mountain region and elsewhere, is familiar to <br />anyone who fOllows natural resource issues. Ranchers onen complain abour government's heavy-handed regulation of <br />public grazing lands, arguing that it curs their herd size and their profitability. Environmentalists, for their part, argue that <br />ranchers graze roo many cattle on public lands, threatening wildlife and the <br />land's overall productivity, degrading riparian habitat and the rivers and streams <br />of the region. <br /> <br />Commercial ranching today <br />is competing with something <br />far more formidable than <br />grazing regulations- <br />"recreational ranching" and <br />second home development. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Whatever the merits of these arguments, commercial ranching today is <br />competing with something far more formidable than grazing regulations. <br />.A...'"nerlca..'1s' pendla.n.t for outdoor ;:I.ctiviri~!" of ::111 sorts is resulting in substantial <br />"recreational ranching"-raising livesrock for the lifestyle rather than a living- <br />and second home development, especially in those places that both showcase the <br />region's spectacular landscapes and offer ready access, by highway Ot airport. The Rocky Mountain region, moreover, is <br />wimessing explosive population growth. Lured by an idyllic setring and abundant recreational opportunities, aHluent <br />newcomers ro Colorado and other parts of the region are buying so-called "ranchettes," 35 acres or so carved out from larger <br />parcels by ranchers and farmers willing ro sell at prices that dwarf the land's agricultural value. As a consequence, the region'S. <br />traditional ranching way of life is losing ground and may be headed for "the last roundup." <br /> <br />I <br />\ <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />i <br /> <br />It is not jUst the future of the region's ranching community that hangs in the balance as this transformation occurs. The <br />proliferation of rural estates makes management of open range for wildlife, for water resources, as well as for ranching, <br />near impossible. Some of the most scenic and productive agricultural lands are dramatically altered by ski resorrs and <br />the lucrative condominium complexes and other real estate development that accompanies them. <br /> <br />American Farmland Trust (AFT) is concerned abour the decline of ranching in rhe region and the impacrs of what has all <br />roo onen become the alternative: sprawling recreational and second home development and the parcelization of rural lands <br />into tracts [00 S!TIall to remain viable for ranching or natural resource management. In this region and across the councry <br />the broader competition for land is adversely affecting the n~tion's ~riculturalland base. Why is it happening? What can <br />and should be done to curb the kind of rural ranchette sprawl that threatens commercial carrIe raising in the Rockies? <br /> <br />To find answers, AFT has sponsored a series of research projects to investigare the competition for land in America, <br />especiallyhow the choices being made by private landowners-affecting agricultural lands, cities and the environmenr- <br />are being influenced by the policy decisions of government. This report, the third in a series, focuses on the competition <br />between wotking ranches and development of ranchettes and recreational facilities on the private mountain meadows <br />that have supplied essential cattle forage for generations. It summarizes a more detailed technical research paper ptepared <br />at our tequest by twO tesource economists at Colorado State University. To obtain a copy of the technical pap.r Ot learn <br />more about the Competition for Land project, we invite you to visit AFT's Web site at www.Earmland.org. <br /> <br />Edward Thompson, Jr. <br />American Farmland Trust <br />Senior Vice President for Public Policy <br /> <br />. <br />