Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I!!t <br />- <br />". <br /> <br />1" <br /> <br />Table ~ <br /> <br />",' <br /> <br />35 Recaptured, juvenile COlorado pikeminnow from experimental <br />stockings performed by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources <br />in the San Juan River in 1996 and 1997. These fish were all <br />collected during adult fish community monitoring (electrofishing) <br /> <br />trips. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />_ 38 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />44 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />r' <br />n' <br /> <br />r~ <br />I""'" <br /> <br />Adult and juvenile COlorado pikeminnow collected from the San <br />Juan River, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah, 1987-1997. .. . .101 <br /> <br />1- <br />T-' <br /> <br />COlorado pikeminnow that were observed, but not collected, <br />during sampling in the San Juan River, 1987-1997 . . .. ... .104 <br /> <br />iT <br />1T <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of ranked total channel catfish CPUE in Reach 6, <br />RM 180.0-158.6 (Tables 38-a to 38-d) . . . . . . . . .. . . .107 <br /> <br />1l' <br />1T <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of channel catfish mean TL data in Reach 6, RM <br />180.0-158.6 (Tables 39-a to 39-d). . . . . . . . . . .. ... .109 <br /> <br />1Y <br />':JI- <br /> <br />J 1- <br />r:1 <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of channel catfish mean biomass data in Reach 6, <br />RM 180.0-158.6 (Tables 40-a to 40-c) . . . . . . . . . . . . .112 <br /> <br />[I <br /> <br />~ I I <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of channel catfish mean condition factor data <br />in Reach 6, RM 180.0-158.6 (Tables 41-a to 41-c) .'. .. ... .114 <br /> <br />111- <br /> <br />a\'- <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of ranked total channel catfish CPUE in the core <br />sampling area, RM 158.6-53.0 (Tables 42-a to 42-c) . . . . . .117 <br /> <br />!: <br /> <br />u::_ <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of channel catfish mean TL data in the core <br />sampling area, RM 158.6-53.0 (Tables 43-a to 43-c) . . . . . . . .120 <br /> <br />~ <br />t <br />.' , <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of channel catfish mean biomass data in the <br />core sampling area, RM 158.6-53.0 (Tables 44-a to 44-c). . . . . .122 <br /> <br />L.: <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of SCheffe,pairwise <br />comparisons of channel catfish mean condition factor data <br />in ,the core sampling area, ~ 158.6-53.0 (Tables 45-a to 45-c) . .127 <br /> <br />-.- <br />L: <br />.; ,~ <br /> <br />Ii..: <br /> <br />One-way ANOVA statistics and matrix of Scheffe pairwise <br />comparisons of ranked total channel catfish CPUE, mean TL <br />data, mean biomass data, and mean condition factor data for <br />June trips, RM 158.6-76.4 (Tables 46-a to 46-d). . . . . . . . . .129 <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />~ <br />LJ <br />..; . <br /> <br />xi <br /> <br />ilJ <br />~ <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />i:S <br />-" <br /> <br />!~ <br />