My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09469
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09469
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:39:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.911
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - SE Needs Assessment and PSOP
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1998
Author
various
Title
Needs Assessment - Alternatives Evaluation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3338 <br /> <br />Wood River, However, most of this water is available as excess run-off only during June <br />and July, We have assumed that, on average, an additional 225 cfs could be diverted from <br />the Upper Greybull River to provide water to an enlarged Upper Sunshine Reservoir, <br />Rawhide Creek Reservoir, or Spring Creek Reservoir, If a closer evaluation of diurnal river <br />fluctuations in this area indicates that this is not possible, these three projects would not meet <br />the yield criteria associated with our coarse screening described in Section 4, These projects <br />do not provide the river re-regulating benefits of our coarse screening criteria, <br /> <br />The most significant cost item associated with the Blackstone Dam Project is the diversion <br />tunnel in the left abutment. A more detailed assessment of technical feasibility for this <br />concept could significantly increase or decrease the costs associated with this primary <br />alternative. A conservative cost estimate has been provided to date, If lower unit costs for <br />tunneling can be provided by more detailed investigations, significant cost savings could be <br />realized over the Lower Roach Gulch Project. <br /> <br />5.3.2 Secondary Alternatives <br /> <br />Enlargement of Upper Sunshine Dam would require that outlet tuonels be constructed in the <br />foundation or abutments of both Upper and Lower Sunshine Dams, A geotechnical <br />assessment of the overall feasibility of this concept would be critical to any further serious <br />considerations, In addition, this alternative would require that each reservoir be drained for <br />at least one irrigation season to construct these features, The environmental and economic <br />impacts associated with draining these reservoirs are expected to be significant and were not <br />included in our initial screening, <br /> <br />An important item that was not included in our cost estimate must be considered when <br />evaluating the Shoshone River Transbasin diversion, There is a provision in the WWDC <br />contract with the USBR that allows the WWDC to defer payment for the next 10 years on <br />the soon-to-be- completed Buffalo Bill Reservoir enlargement, Deferred payment may only <br />take place if the State does not use the yield from the project during that IO-year period, <br />The penalty for use of the yield before that time would be approximately $2 million which <br />would add significant cost to the already expensive Shoshone River Transbasin alternative, <br /> <br />The key element that most conservation projects cannot provide is timely irrigation <br />deliveries, High value crops such as sugar beets and dry beans must have a constant, <br />reliable supply of water to survive, This can best be provided by storing excess river flows <br />for supplemental use when the flow is not available in the river, The impact of timely water <br />deliveries was not included as part of our initial screening criteria and could be significant <br />for any future conservation project. In addition, lower basin storage should be considered <br />as a very important aspect of water conservation because it provides the ability to capture <br />and reuse existing river flows which are currently wasted during spring run-off and during <br />the winter return flow months, <br /> <br />Two key challenges are associated with the groundwater development alternative, These <br />include reduced return flows associated with the interconnection of groundwater in the <br /> <br />940'7''.REPORT\TEX1".vt <br /> <br />5-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.