Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f <br /> <br />332G <br /> <br />Steve Arveschoug and <br />sse Members <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />April 29, 1998 <br /> <br /> <br />6. The screening of alternatives will be accomplishe at the J e 10, 1998, sse Meetirig. <br /> <br />To help sse members understand the decision analysis process, an lcation on a <br />similar project in Wyoming is provided as Attachment I, As explained on April 22, 1998, the <br />process will require participation by the sse members (and others, as appropriate) in a group setting, <br />We will try to obtain as much from the sse~ut as po<<iblt: prier to tht: Jtu.l~ Ill, 199'8, meeting, <br />---- <br />As a fITst step, we would like to obtain your input on the basic decision analysis framework <br />(Figure 1) and the relative weights of th~ proj!ct goals and objectives, An extra copy of Figure I <br />is enclosed with instructions i~hmef!!-2. We hope you will take some time to carefully <br />consider the relative importance of each goal, subgoal, and objective from your own agency's <br />perspective, <br /> <br />RAW:ras <br />Enclosures <br /> <br />974111SCREEN2 MMO <br />