Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3304 <br /> <br />CRITERIA WEIGHTING PROCESS <br />Evaluation of Arkansas Basin Storage Alternatives <br />10-Jun.98 <br /> <br />GOAL: Maximize Operational Effectiveness <br />SUBGOALS: Maximize Storage Potential <br /> Minimize Adverse WQ Impacts <br /> Enhance Exchange Potentials <br /> Maximize District-Wide Benefits <br /> ~A.- <br /> Higher importance for Higher importance for Paint Pair b '" <br /> ~ Storage Potential WQ Impacts ~ Selected <br />Maximize Storage Potential 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ~ I" <br /> --- <br />Minimize Adverse WQ Impacts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 <br /> Higher importance for Higher importance for Point Pair <br /> ~ Storage Potential Exchange Potentials ~ Selected <br />Maximize Storage Potential 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 fE ~ <br />Enhance Exchange Potentials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 '-I <br /> Higher importance for Higher importance for Point Pair <br /> +- Storage Potential District-Wide Benefits ~ Selected <br />Maximize Storage Potential 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 tE 5- <br />Maximize District-Wide Benefits 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ~ <br /> Higher importance for Higher importance for Point Pair <br /> ~ WQ Impacts District-Wide Benefits ~ Selected <br />Minimize Adverse WQ Impacts 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ffi <br />Enhance Exchange Potentials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 <br /> <br />GEl Consultants, Inc. <br />Project 95328 <br /> <br />OPEFF.XLS <br /> <br />Ballot No,7 <br /> <br />Jr <br />