Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />NAU Sand Bar Studies <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />study sites to the 1996 Controlled Flood, In addition, the data indicate no response at the sites <br /> <br /> <br />following the August 10, Paria River flood. During the August 1997-Apri11998 period, the average <br /> <br /> <br />main channel bed thickness increased 0.33 m and 0.42 m in upper and lower Marble Canyon, <br /> <br /> <br />respectively (Fig, 7c). However, average eddy thickness remained relatively unchanged, suggesting <br /> <br /> <br />that eddies remained at a relatively full condition as compared to August 1997, Dam releases during <br /> <br /> <br />this period were moderately high [average daily mean of 538 ml/s (\9,000 fe/s)], The channel bed <br /> <br /> <br />thickness increase is possibly the result of the coarsest size fractions of the Paria River supplied sand <br /> <br /> <br />moving slowly downstream (compared to the finer sizes), In contrast, there is no indication that <br /> <br /> <br />deposition of Pari a-supplied sediment in eddies occurred during this period, <br /> <br /> <br />The total mass of sand stored at the study sites is illustrated in Fig. II for 1996-1998, During this <br /> <br /> <br />two-year period, the Paria River sand input was below normal in 1996 and above nonnal in 1997 (D, <br /> <br /> <br />Topping, written comm" 1999), On the basis of this mass sum, we conclude that within two years of <br /> <br /> <br />the 1996 Controlled Flood, sand storage at the sites had returned to levels comparable to those <br /> <br /> <br />measured before the flood, These data suggest that the low elevation areas recover from scour <br /> <br /> <br />following high flows, such as the 1996 Controlled Flood, over a period of several years, Recovery <br /> <br /> <br />results from a combination of intracanyon recycling (erosion and transfer of high-elevation sand back <br /> <br /> <br />to low elevation storage) and from tributary sand inputs. However, most of the recovery at the sites <br /> <br /> <br />occurred prior to sand inputs by the 1997 Paria River floods, This may indicate, as suggested by <br /> <br /> <br />Topping et al. (2000b), that the total volume of sand in low elevation eddy and channel storage in <br /> <br /> <br />Marble Canyon is small, compared to the amount of sediment supplied to it by the Paria River. <br /> <br /> <br />In order to prolong the residence time of tributary-supplied sediment in the system, a greater stage <br /> <br /> <br />increase is required to access high elevation areas available for deposition. Floods on the Paria River <br /> <br /> <br />do not raise main stem discharge high enough and for sufficient duration to result in channel margin <br /> <br /> <br />deposition above stage levels reached by nonnal dam releases, Timing higher flows to be coincident <br /> <br /> <br />with or shortly following the summer and fall sediment input season improves the likelihood that finer <br /> <br /> <br />sediments will be effectively conserved, especially within upstream reaches closest to the dam. <br /> <br />',." <br /> <br />.'....:1 <br />.. <br /> <br />~;. <br />i,-j <br />"'i!' <br />\. <br /> <br />;;~ <br /> <br />.."(. <br /> <br />'".. <br />;~~~ <br />;::; <br /> <br />;'1 <br /> <br />:., <br />:' <br /> <br />;~{... <br />(;" <br /> <br />, <br />.....: <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />~ ~. <br />"..~., <br /> <br />~~:':I <br />:::~ <br />.. <br />"n <br />~: <br />~.;~ <br /> <br />28 <br />