My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09464
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09464
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:39:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.D
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/24/2000
Author
Hazel et al.
Title
Sand Deposition in the Colorado River Ecosystem from Flooding of the Paria River and the Effects of the Nov 1997 Glen Canyon Dam Test Flow
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />NAU Sand Bar Studies <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />study sites to the 1996 Controlled Flood, In addition, the data indicate no response at the sites <br /> <br /> <br />following the August 10, Paria River flood. During the August 1997-Apri11998 period, the average <br /> <br /> <br />main channel bed thickness increased 0.33 m and 0.42 m in upper and lower Marble Canyon, <br /> <br /> <br />respectively (Fig, 7c). However, average eddy thickness remained relatively unchanged, suggesting <br /> <br /> <br />that eddies remained at a relatively full condition as compared to August 1997, Dam releases during <br /> <br /> <br />this period were moderately high [average daily mean of 538 ml/s (\9,000 fe/s)], The channel bed <br /> <br /> <br />thickness increase is possibly the result of the coarsest size fractions of the Paria River supplied sand <br /> <br /> <br />moving slowly downstream (compared to the finer sizes), In contrast, there is no indication that <br /> <br /> <br />deposition of Pari a-supplied sediment in eddies occurred during this period, <br /> <br /> <br />The total mass of sand stored at the study sites is illustrated in Fig. II for 1996-1998, During this <br /> <br /> <br />two-year period, the Paria River sand input was below normal in 1996 and above nonnal in 1997 (D, <br /> <br /> <br />Topping, written comm" 1999), On the basis of this mass sum, we conclude that within two years of <br /> <br /> <br />the 1996 Controlled Flood, sand storage at the sites had returned to levels comparable to those <br /> <br /> <br />measured before the flood, These data suggest that the low elevation areas recover from scour <br /> <br /> <br />following high flows, such as the 1996 Controlled Flood, over a period of several years, Recovery <br /> <br /> <br />results from a combination of intracanyon recycling (erosion and transfer of high-elevation sand back <br /> <br /> <br />to low elevation storage) and from tributary sand inputs. However, most of the recovery at the sites <br /> <br /> <br />occurred prior to sand inputs by the 1997 Paria River floods, This may indicate, as suggested by <br /> <br /> <br />Topping et al. (2000b), that the total volume of sand in low elevation eddy and channel storage in <br /> <br /> <br />Marble Canyon is small, compared to the amount of sediment supplied to it by the Paria River. <br /> <br /> <br />In order to prolong the residence time of tributary-supplied sediment in the system, a greater stage <br /> <br /> <br />increase is required to access high elevation areas available for deposition. Floods on the Paria River <br /> <br /> <br />do not raise main stem discharge high enough and for sufficient duration to result in channel margin <br /> <br /> <br />deposition above stage levels reached by nonnal dam releases, Timing higher flows to be coincident <br /> <br /> <br />with or shortly following the summer and fall sediment input season improves the likelihood that finer <br /> <br /> <br />sediments will be effectively conserved, especially within upstream reaches closest to the dam. <br /> <br />',." <br /> <br />.'....:1 <br />.. <br /> <br />~;. <br />i,-j <br />"'i!' <br />\. <br /> <br />;;~ <br /> <br />.."(. <br /> <br />'".. <br />;~~~ <br />;::; <br /> <br />;'1 <br /> <br />:., <br />:' <br /> <br />;~{... <br />(;" <br /> <br />, <br />.....: <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />~ ~. <br />"..~., <br /> <br />~~:':I <br />:::~ <br />.. <br />"n <br />~: <br />~.;~ <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.