Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NAU Sand Bar Studies <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />the morphology of the area of eddy erosion (Fig. 5), which resembled the shapes of the scars left by the <br /> <br />mass failures described by Cluer (1995) and Andrews et ai, (1999), A semi-circular depression more <br /> <br /> <br />than 3 m deep was fanned in the reattachment bar at the downstream end of eddy (Fig, 5b). Failure of <br /> <br /> <br />the eddy bar was entirely subaqueous and the high-elevation bar was not affected. Approximately half <br /> <br /> <br />of this mass failure was deposited on the slope of the bed between Eddy 3 and the main channel in <br /> <br /> <br />Segment 4 (Fig, 3b), On day 2, 12,790 m' of sand were eroded from the main channel in Segment 4, <br /> <br /> <br />and an additional 1,800 m' of sand was eroded from Eddy 3, The proportion of these changes that <br /> <br /> <br />occurred in Eddy 3 and in the adjacent pool varied over time. Despite deposition in Eddy 3 towards <br /> <br /> <br />the end of the test flow, the net change was erosion of 2,570 m' of sand, The net effect of the 2-day <br /> <br /> <br />test flow in segments 3 and 4 was erosion (Table 1), The estimated amount of remaining Paria- <br /> <br /> <br />supplied sand in the 3-km reach at the end of the 1997 Test Flow was 115,000 m3 (0.20 million Mg), <br /> <br /> <br />about 7 to 10% of the 1997, August-September sand inputs, <br /> <br />:'" <br /> <br />", <br />~: I <br /> <br />CI <br /> <br />t.", <br /> <br />>~ <br />," <br />,;..; <br />~f <br /> <br />Changes in Suspended Sediment Concentrations and Grain Size <br /> <br /> <br />Suspended-sediment concentrations in the main-<:hannel at the lower Marble Canyon gage <br /> <br />decreased during the two days of the 1997 Test Flow (Fig, 6a), There was a decrease by a factor of <br /> <br /> <br />five in silt and clay concentration (from 0,04% to 0.008% by volume) and a decrease by more than a <br /> <br /> <br />factor of three in sand concentration (from 0,07% to 0,02% by volume), In contrast to the sampling 2 <br /> <br /> <br />months earlier during tributary flooding, sand was the dominant portion of the suspended load during <br /> <br /> <br />the test flow, increasing from 62% on the first day to 82% on the second and last day, These results <br /> <br /> <br />are remarkably similar to measurements during the 1996 Controlled Flood when the total sediment <br /> <br /> <br />concentration decreased the most during the first two days of the flood and sand varied from 73% to <br /> <br /> <br />88% of the total suspended sediment (Rubin et ai" 1998; Topping et ai" 1999), <br /> <br /> <br />The decrease in suspended-sediment concentration in the main-<:hannel during the 1997 Test Flow <br /> <br /> <br />was coincident with an increase in suspended grain-size and bed-material grain-size, The median grain <br /> <br /> <br />size of the suspended sediment increased from 0,09 to 0,105 mID and the bed particles increased from <br /> <br /> <br />0,27 to 0,3 nun, mostly during the first day (Fig, 6b). This same pattern was observed during the 1996 <br /> <br /> <br />Controlled Flood and is thought to result from depletion of fine-grained sediment from the channel <br /> <br /> <br />bed, either by deposition at higher elevations along the channel margin or transport through the canyon <br /> <br /> <br />(Rubin et ai" 1998; Topping et ai" 1999), The main difference between the suspended-sediment <br /> <br /> <br />grain-size evolution during the two flood experiments is that at the start of the 1997 Test Flow both the <br /> <br /> <br />suspended sediment and the bed material at the lower Marble Canyon gage was finer, At the end of <br /> <br />... <br />,~- <br /> <br />" <br />.. <br />.Cr <br /> <br />~;... <br />" <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />~ <br />"~1: <br /> <br />t} <br />< <br />'! <br />~ <br />:'<i <br />.;J <br />% <br />~~ <br />~~;: <br /> <br />,'.' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. I <br />