My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09444
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:41 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:38:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/1/1967
Author
BOR
Title
Reconnaissance Report - St Vrain Unit-Colorado Longs Peak Division - Missouri River Basin Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l' r. ~: 3 8 0 <br />'..' " '." , .~ <br /> <br />Agricultural Development <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of previously irrigated land have been lost in the last 15 years to <br />highway, urban, and industrial expansion. Also, some previously <br />irrigated lands are not presently irrigated because of conversion <br />of water rights from agricultural to municipal and industrial uses. <br /> <br />It is estimated that about 134,000 acres of agricultural land <br />are presently under a ditch or well system. Of this amo\U1t, about <br />2,400 acres use a ground-water supply. About 95,000 acres of the <br />134,000 acres are located within the present boundaries of the Northetn <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District; the remainder, 39,000 acres, <br />is outside district boundaries. The general location of the irrigated <br />lands is shown on exhibit 2. <br /> <br />Previous Land Classification Studies <br /> <br />No land classification survey was made for the St. Vrain Unit <br />investigations because in the early phases of the studies it was <br />concluded that sufficient in-basin water supplies were not economically <br />availa~le to warrant consideration of additional surface-water irriga~ <br />tion dEivelopment. The matter is further complicated by some of the <br />presently non-irrigated land being absorbed by new urban development. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A detailed land classification was completed by the Bureau in <br />1953 on approximately 55,000 acres in connection with certification <br />requirements for the Boulder Creek Supply Canal. This classification <br />was copfined to areas that could be served from the existingdistri-, <br />butionsystem. The classification indicated that, of the 55,000 acres," <br />there were 35,000 acres of irrigable land, of which 4,000 acres were <br />not irrigated. Also, there were 5,000 acres of irrigated land that <br />did not meet the requirements for irrigable land according to Bureau <br />of Reclamation standards; the principal limitation was lack of sub- <br />surface drainage. <br /> <br />Irrigation Potentialities <br /> <br />If in some future studies irrigation is considered a part of <br />the pl~n of development, some land classification information would be <br />required. There would be a need to determine more accurately the <br />amount of presently irrigated land and if it is pump or gravity' <br />l\(rrigated. Also, information would be required on the amount of <br />irrigated land for which the use of supplemental water would not be <br />recol!llllended; these lands have soils which are extremely shallow to <br />shale ,or cobble or have a high water table and/or concentration of <br />soluble salts. The present production on these lands is low and the. <br />application of more water could destroy their capabilities for any <br />type of production. In addition, there is considerable land under <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />.,' 'H'r cd.' .,-i > -~~~ "..:;; \ -. ;ci;< )'~'- <br /> <br /> <br />31. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.