Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />were necessary so that the model would simulate 1991-2000 drawdown rates consistent with <br />observations by the South Metro water providers. To accomplish this, and recalling that the <br />"pristine head" targets were actually developed from a very sparse and uncertain dataset, the <br />a and tP weights were reduced to zero and equal weights were assigned to <br />PSSEH1991, t;SSEDDl991-2000, and roSSEH2000. To further emphasize the importance of <br />the Arapahoe aquifer, for the overall summer SSE weights were applied to the individual layer <br />SSEs of I, I, 2, I for the Lower Dawson, Denver, Arapahoe, and Laramie - Fox Hills aquifers, <br />respectively. The calibration process continued until the new weight error sum was minimized <br />(Fig. 3.5b). <br /> <br />The last refmements to achieve what was deemed as a fmal calibrated model ready for <br />application to future pumping scenarios were undertaken to improve the "visual fit" of key flow <br />features in the 1991 and 2000 water level maps (Reference 3.1, p. 205). For example, among the <br />flow features assessed was the region of steep hydraulic gradients along the southeast side of the <br />South Metro area. To achieve close correspondence between the model and data, the following <br />was completed: <br /> <br />. Reduction of the conductivity for all layers on the eastern side of the basin. <br />. Insertion ofa 3- to 7-cell thick low-permeability zone from the vicinity of the intersection of <br />the Arapahoe, Douglas, and Elbert county boundaries on the northeast diagonally trending to <br />the southwest through Castle Rock and terminating in the vicinity of Dawson Butte. <br /> <br />These adjustments greatly improved the model fit to the 1991-2000 aquifer behavior and they are <br />consistent with the hydrostratigraphic conceptual model of the Denver Basin being developed by <br />Raynolds (Reference 3.3). <br /> <br />3.2.2.6 Example Results from Calibrated Model - Figures 3.6 through 3.12 present some <br />results to illustrate the fit of the final calibrated model to observations. <br /> <br />. Figure 3.6 shows the final calibration recharge distribution <br />. Figure 3.7 presents the final calibrated hydraulic conductivity fields for: (a) the Lower <br />Dawson, (b) the Denver, (c) the Upper Arapahoe, and (d) the Laramie - Fox Hills aquifer <br />units. <br />. Figure 3.8 provides representative predicted and observed hydrographs for wells completed <br />in each of the aquifers at several locations across the basin. <br />. Figure 3.9 presents contour maps of observed and simulated 2000 heads in the Lower <br />Dawson aquifer. Both of these charts indicate close correspondence between the calibrated <br />model and field observations for the Dawson aquifer. <br />. Figures 3.1 0, 3.11, and 3.12 present the observed and predicted 2000 heads for the Denver, <br />Upper Arapahoe, and Laramie-Fox HiJls aquifers. <br />. Figure 3.13 shows posting maps of head residuals (data- model) for: (a) the Lower Dawson, <br />(b) the Denver, (c) the Upper Arapahoe, and (d) the Laramie - Fox Hills aquifers. <br /> <br />3.2.3 Model Application for Future Development Scenarios - Using the calibrated model, a <br />simulation of future aquifer response to pumping was performed under three separate scenarios. <br />For completeness, below are listed all five scenarios analyzed in the overall water supply study. <br /> <br />Page 3-16 <br />