WSP09428

• File Number: 8449.926
• Description: South Metro Water Supply Study
• State: CO
• Basin: South Platte
• Date: 2/1/2004
• Author: SMWSS Board
• Title: South Metro Water Supply Study
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Publication

.
.
.
.
.
.
. Table 1.1
. Table I.:!
Table 1.3
.
. Table 2.1
Table 2.2
. Table 2.3
.
. Table 3.1
Table 3.2
. Table 3.3
.
. Table4.1
. Table 4.2
Table 4.3
. Table 4.4
. Table..t.5
. Table 4.6
Table 4.7
. Table 4.8
. Table 4.9
. Table ..LlO
. Table 4.11
Table 4.12
. Table 4.13
. Table 4.14
. Table .U 5
. Table 5.1
. Table 5.2
Table 5.3
. Table 504
. Table 5.5
. Table 5.6
. Table 6-1
. Table 6-2
. Table 7.1
. Table 7.2
. Table 7.3
Table 7.4
. Table 7.5
.
.
.
.
.
.

LIST OF T AIlLES

Potential Recoverable Ground Water in Study Area
Total and Potential Recoverable Ground Waler - Denver Basin Aquifers
Denver Basin Aquifers-Representative Water Quality

Population Projections for Douglas County and South-Central Arapahoe County
Population Projections for Study Panicipants
Water Demands by Water Provider through 2050

Pumping Estimates (throug.h 2050) fOf Key South Metro Water Providers
Regional Water Elevations by water provider areas in 2010,2020. 2030. 2040. and 2050
Arapahoe Aquifer detailed mass balance calculation by water-provider

Lower Dawson Aquifer Zone Values
Denver Aquifer Zone Values
Arapahoe Aquifer Zone Values
LFH Aquifer Zone Values
Comparison of Pumping Test and Thiem Equation Pumping Rates
Pumping Test Data and Thiem Equation Calculations
Comparison Bet\.\'cen Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-Parker A-3
Comparison Bet\'oeen Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-ECCV SA-2
Comparison Between Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-Centennial A-3
Comparison Between Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-Centennial A-6
Comparison Between Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-Centennial A-lOR
Comparison Be['\'een Thiem Spreadsheet and MeW Analysis-Parker LFH-I
Comparison Between Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-Centennial LFH-4
Comparison Bef"..'een Thiem Spreadsheet and MCW Analysis-Centcnnial D-4
Total Number of Additional Wells by Provider. Alternative, and Aquifer

Summary ofPACSM Analysis of Potential Water Availability
Modeling Summary-Alternative 1 A
Modeling Summary-Alternath1c I B
Modeling Summary-Alternati\"e 2
Modeling Summary-Alternati'..e 3A
Modeling Summary-Alternative 3B

Average Surface Water Deliveries
Alternative Cost Comparison Summary

Population Gro\\th and Water Demand
I O-year Period Construction Costs - 2003 Dollars
IO-year Incremental O&M Costs - 2003 Dollars
Example Tap Fee Calculation-Alternative I B
Additional Annual Service Charges without Inflation

]-7
]-7
]-8

2-4
2-5
2-9

3-12
3-40
3-47

4-7
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-14
4-15,16
4-18
4-19
4-20
4-21
4-22
4-23
4-24
4-25
4-27.28

5-9
5-16
5-17
5-18
5-19
5-20

6-19
6-33-37

7-2
7-4
7-4
7-8
7-13