Laserfiche WebLink
<br />water provider's boundaries, and greater levels of reuse through extended capture of reusable <br />supplies. <br /> <br />For example, the ECCV is currently increasing its supply through the importation of Arapahoe <br />and Laramie-Fox Hills waters purchased from the Willows Water District and located <br />approximately ten miles from their District. ACWW A and Cottonwood are currently pursuing a <br />potential plan for indirect potable reuse, which would greatly expand their capability to reuse <br />their water supplies. <br /> <br />As such, the South Metro Area is already reaching the point where continued development of <br />available water supplies to meet increasing demands is difficult. At the same time, the <br />population of the South Metro Area is expected to double over the next twenty years. Unless <br />other sources of supply can be identified and developed, the South Metro Area will have to meet <br />these demands through very concentrated development of its non-tributary ground water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />Since the denial of the Two Forks pennit in 1989, the water providers have been evaluating the <br />non-tributary ground water as a resource that can be utilized to meet its development needs. The <br />water providers recognize that concentrated development and mining of the resource will result <br />in diminishment of the water providers' abilities to pump this water. There have been many <br />disagreements over the length of time that this supply may be available as a viable resource. <br />However, the conclusions are that the ability to produce non-tributary ground water is limited, <br />and that other water supply solutions are necessary in the future. On the other hand, the water <br />providers recognize the tremendous value of this large ground water reserve that should be used <br />prudently with proper stewardship. For many years, the study participants have considered the <br />value in the ground water supply as the ability to conjunctively utilize this water supply to <br />leverage and increase the availability of renewable surface supplies from surface water sources. <br />Therefore, for many years these water providers have been pursuing the concept of conjunctive <br />use. <br /> <br />1.5 Conjunctive Use <br /> <br />The South Metro Area water providers have defined conjunctive use as the following. <br />Con;unctive Use: The coordinated use of surface water and ground water resources and <br />facilities to produce a larger, more reliable, and cost effective combined water supply than <br />could be generated from either source alone. <br /> <br />The first component of conjunctive use is the ground water resource described above. While an <br />excellent source of water supply, over-development will reduce the viability of the supply. <br />Therefore, the objective under a conjunctive use plan is to reduce reliance on this resource. <br /> <br />Tributary surface water supplies produce highly variable volumes of water supply each year. <br />Figure 1.4 shows the annual water supply in the South Platte River Basin over a 44-year period <br />of record and Figure 1.5 presents similar infonnation for the Blue River Basin. These figures <br />show the high variability above and below the average water supply yield over that time period. <br />With the very significant water supply development in these basins to date, the use or diversion <br /> <br />Page 1-12 <br /> <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />~ <br />