My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09412
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:37:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1972
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1971
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..,:-:nO <br />1J~,.:' <br /> <br />Bids for constructing Crystal Dam on the <br />Gunnison River near Montrose, Colorado, <br />were rejected during 1971 because of exces- <br />sive costs. Originally designed as an earthfill <br />dam, the Bureau of Reclamation now plans <br />to construct a concrete arch dam which will <br />have less adverse impact on the environment. <br />Construction of a diversion tunnel around <br />the damsite was started in 1971, but construc- <br />tion of the dam will not commence until <br />1973. This dam will be the third and final <br />feature of the Curecanti Storage Unit and <br />will enable Morrow Point Powerplant to be <br />operated more efficiently. <br />A contract was awarded in 1971 for con- <br />struction of a 15-mile long section of the Jor- <br />dan Aqueduct, a feature of the Bonneville <br />Unit of the Central Utah Project, <br />During 1971, construction commenced on <br />the Jim Bridger coal-fired powerplant locat- <br />ed near Rock Springs, Wyoming, a joint ven- <br />ture by Idaho Power Company and Pacific <br />Power and Light Company. The Project will <br />\Ig@ approximately 3Q,llOQ aere f-eet of water <br />per year from the Green River for cooling <br />purposes. A draft environmental impact <br />statement on the project was released in Sep- <br />tember 1971 by the U. S. Bureau of Land <br />Management. The report stated that blow- <br />down water from the cooling system will not <br />be returned to the river. It also estimated that <br />the removal of 30,000 acre-feet of water per <br />year would increase the salinity concentra- <br />t!on below Hoover Dam by 1.4 parts per mil- <br />lion (ppm), from 700 parts per million to <br />701.4 ppm. <br />The Board's staff reviewed a State of <br />Wyoming report entitled, "Water and Relat- <br />ed Land Resources of the Green River Basin <br />, <br />Wyoming", which is the first of a series of <br />reports to be made on water needs and re- <br />sources in various river basins of Wyoming <br />for the purpose of developing a State Water <br />Plan, Several alternative plans of water re- <br />source development are presented which re- <br />quire the construction of one or more of <br />three proposed reservoirs identified as the <br />Kendall, New Fork Narrows, and Lower <br />Green Reservoirs. The report points out that <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />if reservoirs are not constructed, water devel- <br />opment will be restricted and Wyoming will <br />likely forfeit from 177,000 to 345,000 acre feet <br />per year of water entitled to the state. Of the <br />various plans of development, the plan with <br />the most adverse effect on water quality <br />would increase the total dissolved solids of <br />the Green River at Green River, Wyoming, <br />from the present level of 320 ppm to 390 ppm <br />without salt pick up, and to 480 ppm if salt <br />pickup would occur. <br /> <br />Lower Basin Developments <br /> <br />Central Arizona Project. During 1971 <br />construction work on the Central Arizona <br />Project (CAP), authorized in 1968, still had <br />not been commenced. The delays have been <br />caused by funding problems and water con- <br />tract negotiating delays. On November 22, <br />1971, the U, S, Office of Management and <br />Budget (OMB) released $2,7 million in <br />funds for the Central Arizona Project, Of <br />that amount, $] 2 million came from a prior <br />year congressional appropriation which had <br />been held in reserve by OMB. The funds will <br />be used to complete an environmental impact <br />statement, to obtain construction bids for the <br />project, to complete work on determination <br />of Indian water allocations, and to negotiate <br />a repayment contract with the State of Ari- <br />zona, <br />The release of funds was significant be- <br />cause it permits calling for bids on the <br />project. Prior to that date, OMB had released <br />slightly over $44 million for CAP as the fed- <br />eral government's 24,3 percent share of con- <br />struction costs for the Navajo Powerplant. <br />This plant will supply power to pump CAP <br />water from the Colorado River to Central <br />Arizona. <br />The Board received a copy ofthe Bureau of <br />Reclamation's September 1971 "Draft of En- <br />vironmental Statement for the Central Ari- <br />zona Project, Arizona-New Mexico", The <br />Board had only minor editorial comments <br />which were coordinated through California's <br />Resources Agency. <br /> <br />Southern Nevada Water Project. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.