My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09412
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:37:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1972
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1971
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. ,....{.....- <br />1 0 i. ~; <br /> <br />REGIONAL WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />The Board continued to support planning <br />efforts that may lead to augmentation of the <br />Colorado River. Board members and staff <br />participated in and reviewed activities of the <br />Federal Water Resources Council, the West- <br />ern States Water Council, and the National <br />Water Commission in order that the Board's <br />interests would be considered in developing <br />policies in the water resources field, <br /> <br />Western United States Water Plan Study <br /> <br />The Western U.S. Water Plan Study <br />(called "Westwide Studies") originated in <br />Titles I and II of the Colorado River Basin <br />Project Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-537). The <br />Board's 1970 Annual Report details Cali- <br />fornia's objections to the study plan outline <br />initially drafted by the Bureau of Reclama- <br />l;Ull. The majtlr tlbjeetioH was that the plm <br />did not emphasize the problems of the Colo- <br />rado River Basin, the planned solution of <br />which was the principal purpose of the legis- <br />lation, <br />During 1971, the Board's Chief Engineer, <br />as a member of the Advisory Committee for <br />the Westwide Studies, continued to partici- <br />pate in review of various drafts of the plan of <br />study in cooperation with the Department of <br />Water Resources. <br />The final draft of the plan of study, dated <br />April I, 1971, did not satisfactorily recognize <br />California's previous comments, The Board <br />coordinated its comments with those of the <br />Department of Water Resources, which were <br />transmitted to Commissioner of Reclamation <br />Armstrong by letter of June 7, 1971, signed <br />by Director of Water Resources William R. <br />Gianelli, California's comments, which were <br />attached to the first Progress Report on the <br />Westwide Studies presented to Congress on <br />June 30, 1971, are summarized as follows: <br />1. The plan of study continues to have the appearance <br />of a Type I Framework Study and the scope is <br />much broader than intended by Congress. The ef- <br />forts of tbe study should be directed towards meet- <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />ing the dominant intent of Congress expressed in <br />the legislative history of P.L. 90-537; i.e., to develop <br />a plan to augment the water supply of the Colorado <br />River, <br />2. The plan of study should state that recommended <br />plans will be prepared for those portions of the <br />Western States where the ten-year moratorIUm on <br />interbasin water transfer studies does not apply. <br />For other areas, such as the Colorado River Basin, <br />the plan of study should state that the development <br />of a recommended plan by June 1977 is not possi- <br />ble. <br />3. The plan of study should recognize that salinity in <br />the Colorado River Basin, especially below Lee <br />Ferry, is a major water resources problem, Results <br />of independently conducted salinity improveme~t <br />projects should be included in the plan as approprI- <br />ate. <br />4. All projections of population and economic devel- <br />opment should be consistent for all the regions of <br />the West and be consistent with one of the national <br />projections. <br />5. The study should make maximum use of infotma- <br />tlon trom other state and federal prograll1~, :<louL:h a.:s <br />desalting. The work-flow sequence charts in the <br />plan of study should acknowledge key information <br />sources and include input from other programs at <br />specific points in time. <br /> <br />At the third meeting of the Advisory Com- <br />mittee on June 18, 1971, staff members and <br />consultants to the Senate and House Com- <br />mittees on Interior and Insular Affairs dis- <br />cussed the West wide Studies. They stated <br />that in their opinion the principal emphasis <br />of the studies should be on augmentation of <br />the Colorado River and that not much em- <br />phasis should be placed on a g~neral plan. for <br />the entire West. Also, they did not believe <br />that Congress intends to spend as much <br />money on the Westwide Studies as is being <br />proposed, <br />As a result of criticism from congressional <br />committees and federal and state agencies, <br />the Bureau of Reclamation announced plans <br />to revise the plan of study. At the close of <br />1971 a revised draft of the study plan had not <br />been received for review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.