Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />2762 <br /> <br />Pueblo Reservoir. An additional problem faced in this case is the ground water that was a part of <br />the purchase and its transferability. <br /> <br />SOCIAL IMPACTS - There has been the usual division between the sellers and non-sellers <br />under the Canal Systems as well as the general public. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - None at this time other than those caused by lands that have <br />had the water removed. However, they could be similar to those under the Twin Lakes/Colorado <br />Canal Company or the Rocky Ford Ditch if any sale or transfer by Public Service takes place. There <br />does not appear to be any revegetation process in place where this transfer has taken place. <br /> <br />COMMENTS -Case 80CW52 changed the type of use and allowed use for the power plant <br />near Las Animas. The later cases request upstream transfers to the Comanche power plant at <br />Pueblo. <br />Information from decree and Don Halffield, Water Coordinator, Public Service Company of <br />Colorado, 12/11/92; research by Kevin Pratt; impacts by Bill Milenski. <br /> <br />A2-19 <br />