Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Water Management Study: Upper Rio Grande Basin <br /> <br />fragmented management structure. Initiation of the Bosque Management <br />Plan elicited significant opposition and did not evolve through the normal <br />activities of resource-management agencies, but required extraordinary <br />political intervention and leadership. Many close observers believe there has <br />been a lack of commitment to follow-through on the plan. The past year saw <br />some movement toward an integrated approach, with representatives from <br />multiple agencies developing a draft paper on management issues in the <br />Middle Rio Grande Valley (Whitney et al. 1996), for example, but <br />considerably more must be done to expand these efforts into a comprehensive <br />assessment of ecological and economic conditions. <br /> <br />, <br />< <br />~ <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />Given the deep antagonism toward what many in this Basin perceive to be <br />hostile federal efforts to restrict conventional consumptive use of water and <br />other resources, we recommend that the assessment process not be included <br />as part of a larger effort to develop and evaluate management alternatives. <br />Merging the .assessment with planning likely would trigger fears that federal <br />agencies were trying to dictate management policies for state, local, and <br />private entities and might elicit enough political opposition to scuttle even <br />the most rudimentary assessment efforts.2 Hence, the assessment should <br />stand alone as an effort to improve understanding of the consequences of <br />management decisions, the potential for ecosystem changes that would be <br />either irreversible or very costly to reverse, and the potential opportunities <br />for increasing the net economic benefits derived from the ecosystem.3 The <br />voluntary participation of non-federal entities should be encouraged. It is <br />essential, however, that the participation of others, whether formal or <br />informal, should not distract the agencies from taking a broad view of the <br />ecosystem and its relationship to the economy. <br /> <br />R <br /> <br />\.; <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />!' <br />l:': <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />2 Research, alone, can be controversial in the Basin. Advocates of diversionary use of <br />water often oppose research proposals from agencies interested in investigating instream <br />issues, and instream advocates reciprocate by opposing proposals related to increasing the <br />supply of water for diversionary use. The governor of New Mexico intervened to calm disputes <br />over research agendas in the Middle Rio Grande Valley by appointing a research coordinator <br />generally seen as neutral. <br />3 It is important to recognize that water and the water-related ecosystem will be the focus <br />of this assessment. This will distinguish this assessment from others, such as in the interior <br />Columbia River Basin, which focused on federal lands. Water is under state control, with <br />rights of use owned by private entities or local public bodies. Hence, the primary objective of <br />this assessment should not be to set the stage for federal land-management plans. but to <br />provide a body of knowledge potentially useful to all resource owners, managers, and <br />regulators. <br /> <br />132 <br /> <br />((,3 ~ 12 <br />