My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09385
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:36:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8555.200
Description
State/Division 3 Water Court Cases - 3-90CW30 Rocky Mountain Bison Inc.
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
8/1/1989
Author
Bishop Brogden Assoc
Title
Zapata Ranch and Great Sand Dunes Country Club Water Supply And Augmentation Plan Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />,// <br /> <br />~ <br />(\ <br /> <br />is <br /> <br />w_ <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />'"(- <br /> <br />-y <br /> <br />L'" <br />u"' <br />In <br />'<"'"I <br />(;:) <br />\;;J <br /> <br />No. 80-CW-t32, when such '...aeer ri~hcs are to be used to <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />aURmenc the diversions described in the dp~licacLon in Case <br /> <br />No. ao-cw-tJ2 (a copy'of s~id motion is at cached as Appendix <br /> <br /> <br />C). The tJacer ~eferee hereby rules chat S.1id I':locioo is .li!:rance<"1, <br /> <br />The Water Referee further finds that the exclusion of said <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'...leer rights from the operation of the decree in CIlse No. <br /> <br />W-))4S will not cause injury to the owners of or persons <br /> <br />entitled to u,e vested w~ter ri(hes. The Water Referee <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />rules chat adequate statutory notice llas been given that <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the water rights that 3re the subject of the application in <br /> <br />Case No, aO-CW-132 were formerly included in the ~lan or <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />augmentation decreed in Case No. P-))45. and no injury will <br /> <br />resuLt from the exclusion of the ~forcQentioned ~ater <br /> <br />rights, therefore, ic is not necessary to file anu nublish a <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />petition to reopen and modify the decree in Case Ho, tJ-)34S. <br /> <br />Ll. From the evidence submitted herein the \Jater <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Referee finds that the ~Lan for au~rnencation pro nosed by <br /> <br />Applica~t will not cause injury to the confinerl aquifer. <br />Applicant's proposed development will consume an estimated <br /> <br />[II <br /> <br />47.50 acre-feet of water annually, of which 22.30 acre-feet <br /> <br />would have historically been recharll,ed to the confined <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />aquifer, By diverting 90 acre-feet annually at the point <br /> <br />specified above, Applicant will artificially recharKe the <br /> <br /> <br />confined aquifer. <br /> <br />12. The Water Referee finds as a matter of hydrolo- <br /> <br /> <br />~ical and seolo~ical fact, that pursuant to the operation of <br /> <br />the plan for au~mentation set forth herein, there is unappro... <br /> <br />.. <br />. <br />-- <br />. <br />+- <br />~-- <br /> <br />priated water available for the groundwater withdrawals <br /> <br />contemplated herein. the Water Referee finds. that pursuant <br /> <br />co the operation of the pLan for au~mencation set €orth <br /> <br />herein, che groundwater withdrawals which arc co provi.de a <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.