<br />D~
<br />
<br />,.
<br />
<br />jogging, watching wildlife,
<br />viewing beautiful scenery,
<br />archeological and cultural
<br />interpretive opportunities,
<br />and well designed facilities
<br />for persons who are dis-
<br />abled. Most reservoirs
<br />meet local and regional
<br />recreational needs, but
<br />several, including lakes
<br />Mead and Powell on the
<br />Colorado River, have
<br />become international des-
<br />tination areas.
<br />The action doesn't stop
<br />at the dam. Excellent
<br />trout fishedes have been
<br />created in the cool, clear
<br />waters released from the
<br />dams. River runners enjoy
<br />rafting opportunities pro-
<br />vided by an assured,
<br />scheduled release of
<br />water. In recent years, the
<br />lower reaches of the dver
<br />have become a center for
<br />powerboat recreation.
<br />Often such activities are
<br />on streams and dvers that
<br />would normally run low
<br />each summer, or at best
<br />not have sufficient water
<br />to provide a quality habi-
<br />tat or recreational exped-
<br />ence. Wildlife values are
<br />improved, either as a
<br />direct benefit or through
<br />extensive mitigation plans,
<br />to replace values lost to
<br />construction of the dams.
<br />Tens of thousands of acres
<br />of big game range have
<br />been purchased to miti-
<br />gate environmental
<br />impacts of Reclamation
<br />projects. They have been
<br />placed in public ownership
<br />and management and are
<br />excellent lands for both
<br />wildlife viewing and hunt-
<br />ing and fishing.
<br />There are 54 reservoirs
<br />in the Upper Colorado
<br />Region with 32 of them in
<br />the Colorado River
<br />drainage. Their combined
<br />water surface totals
<br />267,295 acres available for
<br />recreation and 2,750 miles
<br />of shoreline. Annually,
<br />more than 8.9 million visi-
<br />tors use the reservoirs and
<br />other project features in
<br />
<br />the upper basin.
<br />The three major reser-
<br />voirs and the flowing river
<br />sections of the Lower
<br />Colorado Region provide
<br />293,354 acres of water sur-
<br />face and 1,917 miles of
<br />shoreline for recreational
<br />pursuits.' Visitors total
<br />about 19 million people
<br />annually.
<br />Reclamation's three
<br />most popular recreation
<br />destinations are all on the
<br />Colorado River: first is
<br />Lake Mead National
<br />Recreation Area (Hoover.
<br />Dam) with 7.1 million visi-,
<br />tor days in 1990; second is
<br />Glen Canyon National
<br />Recreation Area (Glen
<br />Canyon Dam) with 6.1
<br />million visitor days; and
<br />third is the Lake Havasu
<br />area (Parker-Davis Dams)
<br />with 1.8 million visitor
<br />days. A visitor day is
<br />based on a combination of
<br />people and hours totaling
<br />12, such as one person for
<br />12 hours, 2 people for 6
<br />hours, and so forth.
<br />The steady increase in
<br />visitation to Reclamation's
<br />facilities on the Colorado
<br />River is consistent with
<br />the growth in visits over
<br />the years to all such facili-
<br />ties. In 1966, there wen~ '
<br />28.8 million visitor days to
<br />all Reclamation sites. In
<br />1990, the total was 53.5
<br />million.
<br />By applying an average
<br />value of $14.22 per visitor
<br />day, the value of recreation
<br />in 1990 at Reclamation's
<br />facilities on the Colorado
<br />River system was approxi-
<br />mately $354 million. The
<br />value is based upon cur-
<br />rent measures used in
<br />National Economic
<br />Development benefit eval-
<br />uation procedures. Also,
<br />the Colorado River por-
<br />tion in 1990 was slightly
<br />less than half of all the
<br />benefits for the entire
<br />Bureau of Reclamation.
<br />
<br />;_.1
<br />
<br />CRWUA
<br />
<br />3'
<br />
<br />Reclamation's long-time
<br />policy has been to transfer
<br />management of recreation,
<br />facilities to other federal
<br />and non-federal agencies.
<br />
<br />Endangered
<br />Species
<br />
<br />The Bureimof
<br />Reclamation is responsible
<br />. for ensuring that agency
<br />aelions do not adversely
<br />impact endangered species
<br />or their habitats and are
<br />not likely to jeopardize
<br />their continued existenc.e'.
<br />Furthermore, Reclamation
<br />is responsible for promot-
<br />ing the recovery and con-
<br />servation of such endan'
<br />gered species and their'
<br />habitats. The construction
<br />and operation of main- .
<br />stem and tributary dams
<br />on the Colorado River sys-
<br />tem have been identified
<br />as having major effects on
<br />the decline of native fish-
<br />es. Species involved
<br />include the humpback
<br />chub, Colorado squawfish,
<br />razorback sucker and the
<br />bony tail chub.
<br />Significantly, many of
<br />the dams that created the
<br />impacts resulting in the'
<br />decline of the species were
<br />constructed 20 to 50 years
<br />prior to the passage ofthe . .
<br />En.dangered Species Act.
<br />However, they'are not
<br />exempted from the
<br />requirements of the act.
<br />Reclamation, the U.S. Fish
<br />and Wildlife Service, the
<br />seven basin states, water
<br />and power users, and envi-
<br />ronmental groups are
<br />working together to devel-
<br />op programs to protect
<br />and preserve the fish while
<br />still allowing necessary
<br />water development to
<br />move forward.
<br />Throughout the entire
<br />river basin, numerous
<br />activities are under way
<br />involving both aquatic and
<br />terrestrial endangered
<br />species. A partial listing of
<br />these includes: bald eagles,
<br />peregrine falcons, desert
<br />
<br />pupfish and the desert
<br />tortoise.
<br />In the Upper Colorado
<br />Region, a recovery imple-
<br />mentation program has
<br />been developed for the
<br />upper basin Colorado
<br />River and its tributaries,
<br />including the Green
<br />River. A similar plan is
<br />now being developed for
<br />the San Juan River.
<br />These plans will allow for
<br />the operation of the dams
<br />in compliance with the
<br />Endangered Species Act.
<br />In the Lower Colorado
<br />Region, the river and its
<br />main .tributaries have
<br />been developed, modi-
<br />fied and depleted much
<br />more extensively than in
<br />the upper basin.
<br />Recovery actions here
<br />have followed a different
<br />approach than that used
<br />for the Upper Colorado
<br />Region. Many remaining
<br />populations offish are in
<br />a reservoir environment
<br />as opposed to that of the
<br />river below dams.
<br />Recovery actions have
<br />generally involved multi-
<br />state, federal and univer-
<br />sity groups on a case-by-'
<br />case basis.
<br />While not all the
<br />answers are yet knbwn,.'
<br />Reclamation is commit-
<br />tedto honoring the spirit.
<br />and intent of the
<br />Endangered Species Act
<br />while also providing for
<br />the necessary delivery of
<br />water and generation of
<br />power to meet contracted
<br />obligations.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />. . iSr":",
<br />",""~ .1
<br />'~,.:-...." j
<br />,v/-/:Qu...... /-
<br />iP ~./' : '~, '\.."~o,,,.,
<br />t ( ..- ~.~ rnEptJf\l~'
<br />"d Jj
<br />;'\~:-;::-:-;--_~;:,:I
<br />
|