My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09376
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09376
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:35:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8446
Description
Cache La Poudre Platte Project
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/1989
Title
Economic Evaluation Procedures Phase II Cache La Poudre Project Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />will move in this direction, due to the influence of the buy-back <br /> <br />provisions of PURPA and the general trend of regulatory <br /> <br />authorities to strive for economically rational energy production <br /> <br />and consumption. But even if this change does not occur, and the <br /> <br />peaking power load growth necessary. to justify a Cache la poudre <br /> <br /> <br />peaking plant is realized, it would then be improper to calculate <br /> <br /> <br />benefits at the 203 mill rate used by Tudor when the power <br /> <br /> <br />produced is, in fact, marketed at a lower rate, This would <br /> <br />constitute a violation of the willingness to pay principle of <br /> <br />benefit estimation which is incorporated in my guidelines. <br /> <br />The problem of uncertainty about future peaking power demand <br /> <br />and price is so great and so fund.amental to estimating the <br /> <br /> <br />benefits of Cache la Poudre alternatives that it deserves special <br /> <br /> <br />attention through a simple decision analysis approach, This <br /> <br />approach will highlight the uncertainties, and their possible <br /> <br />consequences, which are involved, will provide a way of dealing <br /> <br />adequately with that uncertainty, and will minimize the <br />additional work required in Phase II. <br /> <br />The essence of the decision analysis approach is to <br />construct two scenarios .and to carry through the analysis of ea~ <br />alternative in the context of each of those scenarios, The <br />.~ <br /> <br />result will be an estimate of the value of each of the evaluation <br /> <br />criteria for each .~~._~~~_~~~~n,~E!yes~J~E-~~c~._scenario, T~ <br />for each alternative, the expected value method will be used to <br />~-~~,"-~.",..,_.~ ' ~---!.. <br /> <br />determine the minimum outcome probability for the higher value~ <br />of the two scenarios which would be required to produce an <br />expected value of the benefit-cost ratio just equal to unity, <br /> <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.