Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2 r. 6 ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES <br />J .1 ARKANSAS BASIN FlITURE WATER AND STORAGE NEEDS ASSESSMENT ENTERPRISE <br /> <br />Environmental Resource Issues <br />Natural resource issues considered in this evaluation include: <br /> <br />Wetlands <br />Threatened and Endangered Species <br />Other State or Forest Service Sensitive Species <br />Wildlife <br />Aquatic Life <br /> <br />The potential adverse and beneficial effects are addressed for each resource category. <br />Opportunities to mitigate adverse effects also are identified. <br /> <br />Criteria for Analysis <br />The purpose of this reconnaissance level environmental review is to preliminarily identify <br />significant environmental issues or fatal flaws that may affect the feasibility of project <br />alternatives. Criteria used to determine the potential significance of environmental issues <br />include: <br /> <br />Adverse impacts to federal threatened or endangered species. <br /> <br />Adverse impacts to Forest Service or other state sensitive species that could lead to a <br />federal listing. <br /> <br />Adverse impacts to large areas of valuable wetland resources. <br /> <br />The loss of important wildlife habitat. <br /> <br />The loss of native or unique plant communities. <br /> <br />Adverse impacts to aquatic resources. <br /> <br />Ability to meet regulatory requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act <br />(CW A), Endangered Species Act (ESA), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and <br />National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). <br /> <br />This study is not intended as a detailed environmental analysis, baseline, or impact <br />assessment suitable for permitting and/or compliance with environmental laws or regulations. <br />Additional detailed studies and field investigations would be necessary to more accurately <br />determine the extent of environmental impacts. Information from this study and other <br />engineering and hydrologic analyses will help provide a basis for comparing the feasibility of the <br />alternative water development projects being evaluated. <br /> <br />2 <br />