My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09374
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09374
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:35:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.911
Description
PSOP Background
Basin
Arkansas
Date
3/1/2000
Author
Montgomery Watson
Title
Envirionmental Issues Prepared for Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment Enterprise
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />~ I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />23~8 <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />This preliminary environmental analysis focuses on potential natural resource impacts <br />associated with six water storage alternatives currently being evaluated by Colorado Springs <br />Utilities (CSU) and the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District (SECWCD). This <br />report addresses potential adverse impacts and beneficial effects that may result from the <br />alternative actions under consideration. Federal, state and local environmental regulations and <br />permitting requirements that affect the feasibility of water development projects were also <br />evaluated. <br /> <br />Natural resource issues considered in this preliminary evaluation include: <br /> <br />Wctlands <br />Federally listed species <br />Other State or Forest Service sensitive species <br />Wildlife <br />Aquatic Life <br /> <br />The preliminary environmental evaluations are based primarily on existing information. <br />Reconnaissance field reviews were conducted for Pueblo Reservoir, Lake Meredith, Williams <br />Creek and several gravel lake storage sites. The field reviews did not include detailed surveys <br />for species of concern or a jurisdictional wetland delineation. Professional judgment and <br />experience with other water resource developments were used to determine potential effects for <br />alternative projects. Some of the existing information may not accurately reflect current <br />conditions. For example, National Wetland Inventory (NWl) mapping, which is based on 1970s <br />aerial photography, was used to determine potential effects to wetlands. <br /> <br />The environmental evaluation for each storage alternative focused on the option that could <br />potentially have the greatest effect relative to the other project alternative options (for example, <br />the reservoir enlargement option with the largest expansion in storage). <br /> <br />The preliminary environmental analysis of the 6 storage alternatives concluded: <br /> <br />Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Reoperation impacts are not likely to be significant unless <br />there are major changes to flows that potentially cause significant adverse effects to <br />aquatic resources and water quality. An issue that may need to be addressed is the <br />possible listing of the Colorado River cutthroat trout and the impacts from West Slope <br />depletions. <br /> <br />IV <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.