My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09372
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09372
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:35:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
10/2/1992
Author
Hydrosphere
Title
Executive Summary - Task 7 Technical Memorandum on Evaluation of Water Development Alternatives - Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001260 .. <br /> <br />Draft Task 7 Technical Memorandum <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Existinl!" Demands and Reservoirs - Baseline Condition <br /> <br />The baseline demand level represents the maximum demand condition which could have <br />occurred in 1989. The total consumptive demand for the baseline condition was estimated in <br />Task 2 of the Study as approximately 121,000 af per year. These baseline demands can be <br />grouped according to their priorities relative to the Juniper project. <br /> <br />Senior Demands and Reservoirs: The majority of the depletions attributable to senior <br />water rights are implicit in the gage-based (depleted) hydrology of the model. These "implicit <br />seniors" include depletions associated with direct flow diversions and with existing reservoirs. <br /> <br />A number of demands were represented explicitly in the model as increments to bring <br />the depletions implicit in the gage up to a uniform baseline demand condition (the maximum <br />demand occurring in 1989). For example, Craig municipal demand needed to be adjusted <br />upward in earlier years of the study period (when there was little actual demand) in order to <br />simulate current municipal demands over the entire study period. These "demand adjustments" <br />are treated as being senior to all other demands explicitly represented in the model in order to <br />be consistent with the use of gage hydrology. Included in these senior demands are demands 1 <br />through 24, and demands 34, 37 and 38 (fable 2). <br /> <br />The three existing reservoirs which were modeled explicitly (Stagecoach, Steamboat <br />Lake, and E1kbead) are treated as having storage rights just senior to the Juniper Project rights. <br />This was done to reflect existing subordinations of the Juniper Project to those reservoirs and <br />to reflect the fact that the reservoirs have historically been allowed to fill without being called <br />out by more senior rights in the basin. <br /> <br />Junior Demands: Approximately 28,180 af of depletion presently occurs in the basin <br />above the Little Snake River under water rights junior to the 1954 Juniper project. <br />Approximately 24,200 af of these junior depletions were explicitly represented in the model. <br />This 24,200 af represents all junior direct flow rights that result in depletions greater than or <br />equal to 5 af per year and all reservoirs that deplete the basin by greater than 700 af per year. <br />The remaining 4000 af of junior depletions result from many smaller irrigation diversions. <br />These depletions were not explicitly modeled in order to simplify the aggregation of junior <br />depletions throughout the basin, and to simplify the complilation of adjustments to gage <br />hydrology. Existing junior demands are represented in the model as demands 50 through 55 <br />(fable 2). In reality, juniors demands are spread throughout the basin with many located on <br />small tributaries. In the model, the six aggregated junior demands were distributed along the <br />mainstem of the Yampa River. <br /> <br />Representing existing junior depletions explicitly in the model required adjustments to <br />the gage hydrology on which the model was based. These adjustments reflected historical <br />depletions by these junior demands. The adjustment was made by adding inflows to the model <br />equal to the amount of the historical depletions of the junior demands occurring over the 53 <br />year study period. The historical depletions were obtained from the Division 6 Engineers data- <br />base on basin diversions. <br /> <br />Future Demands - 2015 and 2040 Conditions <br /> <br />Senior Demands and Reservoirs: All new reservoirs and reservoir enlargements <br />represented in the model were treated as having rights senior to the Juniper Project rights. <br />This reflects the assumption that portions of the Juniper storage right would be "peeled off" <br />and transferred to these new storage facilities as part of any agreement for conversion of the <br />Juniper rights to instream flow. As a result, these new storage facilities are allowed to fill <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />1 .~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.