Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />r-- <br />~f'" <br /> <br />, <br />, . <br /> <br />,..-~ <br /> <br />1...-.-' <br /> <br />W. R. Grace & Co. The technology is promising at its current <br />scale. However, a larger demonstration size test loop program is <br />required before that technology can be utilized for a project <br />such as AQUATRAIN. We have been looking for sites to install and <br />operate such a C02 slurry test facility. A site we had <br />identified at a power station in Texas has recently become <br />unavailable and we are now in the process of locating another <br />site. <br /> <br />r <br />",_. <br /> <br />One additional technology we believe vital to AQUATRAIN is the <br />ChemCoal technology to make a compliance coal, being developed by <br />a partnership in which the principals in Aquatrain are also <br />involved. This product is now being produced in a continuous <br />pilot plant. Our co-investors in that venture include Burlington <br />Northern Inc. and MidCon Corp. Also, Koppers Company holds an <br />option to join us. This venture has recently exercised an option <br />to acquire a small refinery near Osage, Wyoming in the Powder <br />River Basin to serve as a demonstration plant. Modification of <br />this refinery should be completed in 1985. These steps should <br />bring the ChemCoal technology to a commercial demonstration level <br />in less than three years from now. <br /> <br />We would be less than candid if we did not point out that <br />technologies we consider vital to the AQUATRAIN Project remain to <br />be completed on a full-scale basis, and that their progress will <br />affect the timing of the AQUATRAIN Project. <br /> <br />Economics <br /> <br />Another area remaining to be defined relates to project economics. <br />My former company built the first coal slurry pipeline in the <br />mid-1950's and has remained active in slurry engineering ever <br />since (the Consolidation Coal System in the State of Ohio). <br />Nevertheless, there has not been the proliferation of slurry <br />pipelines we all expected. <br /> <br />Also, having been a director of several railroads, I have viewed <br />the slurry pipeline question from more than one side of the <br />question. There is not time to go into all the reasons why <br />slurry pipelines are not more commonplace. However, for a <br />project such as AQUATRAIN to compete with an existing rail <br />system, it must have a tariff less than the marginal cost of <br />operating the in-place rail system. To do this, a very large <br />throughput and long haul is required, usually not less than 30 <br />million TPY or 500 miles in length. <br /> <br />The important point is that the role of coal in filling the <br />critical gap created by overdependence upon depleting petroleum <br />will be so demanding that it will tax the railroads to meet the <br />traffic in about 15 years. Slurry pipelines will not be <br />successful if they are planned to take away the cream of the <br />railroad in existing business - the high load, long distance <br />hauls. They will only work if they help bear economical future <br />demand. <br /> <br />-2- <br />