My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09344
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:53:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:35:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407.500
Description
Platte River Basin General Publications - Missouri River General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/1/1974
Author
USWRC
Title
1975 Water Assessment - Guidelines for Conducting Phase II - Specific Problem Analysis - Enclosure C
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Second, the Council requests that a form as shown in Figure 3 be <br />us.ed by all participants in characterizing and describing the nature <br />and relative severity of each identified Problem. With this pro- <br />cedure, each participant will submit to the Study Director a single <br />map accompanied by a set of completed forms -- one form for <br />each Problem identified, characterized. and described. The <br />basic information to be provided is summarized as follows: <br /> <br />. Name of participant identifying Problem <br />o Short title expressing the essence of the Problem <br />. A Problem code number as referenced to the map <br />o Narrative description of the geographical area that the <br />Problem encompasses <br />. Time frame of the P;roblem (either. 1975-1985 or 1985-2000) <br />. Principal Problem Issue( s) and Functional Use( s) involved <br />(see checklist on Figure 3) <br />. Brief narrative and perhaps numerical description of the <br />Problem including: <br /> <br />Reference source(s) of the Problem (Central Case or <br />.other planning- study results). <br />A brief description of how and why each intersection <br />marked in the cJ:1ecklist 6f major Issues and Functiona.l <br />Uses contributes to the severity of the Problem <br />identified. <br />A brief description of the beneficial and adverse Effects <br />of each Problem Issue on each Functional Use, the <br />region, and the environment. The descriptions shoUld <br />focus upon indicating the effects of not solving the <br />Problem identified. <br /> <br />3. Third, in locating the geographical extent of an identified Problem, <br />care should be t.aken to not encompass too large or too small a <br />geographic area. For example, the Council is not interested in <br />identifying Problems located in an individual's backyard or even <br />those associated with a small portion of a. stream reach. unless <br />the Problem is particularly severe and in dire need of Federal <br />assistance to insure adequate resolution. On the other hand, <br />the Council would find it difficult to handle a Problem with a <br />geographical extent encompassing an entire region; a large <br />portion thereof; or even an entire ASA.. <br /> <br />"f <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.