Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />ACTTV(TJES, PROOUCTS,Ai\D SUGGESTED l-'ROCl,:OlIlU:S <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />A.:3 d~~crib"d in the Plan of Study, Phase II of the Specific Prublem AnalY',l.; <br />is cO!TIprised of four 3.ctivities. As sho\vn in Figure 2, these four c~cti.....i.t~.2S <br />hCl'.'e b~en subcli\~ided into 19 specific sub-activities \vhich the Councll sl.l;2:~ests <br />t.~~:\.~ f:'H~ Regional Sponsor conduct in orde:- to de.velop the. products e:-:p'2cte~~ <br /> <br />ACTIVITY ONE - Problem Identification <br />(February 1975 - June 1975) <br /> <br />The objective of this Activity is to identify, locate on a map, and briefly describe <br />the existi!1g and .fuhue wat.er and related land resource problems perceived to <br />be se"ere by representatives of di,'erse interests within each wat"e" resources <br />regiJD. <br /> <br />EJ.rly "esults (Central Case projections) from the Nationwide Ana.lysis portion <br />of the Assessment will be given to the Regional Sponsors in Februarv 1975 in <br />order to provide the Regional Sponsors with a nationally consistent frameworK to <br />relate to as problems are identified, located, 'lnd described. <br /> <br />The items of information to be provided to the Regional Sponsors in <br />February of 1975 for each of the Aggregated Subareas are listed in detail in <br />Appendix C, however, they are of the following types: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1. Estimates of current water use (1975) and projections uf <br />water requirements for 1985 and 2000 based upon the <br />Central Case assumptions. <br /> <br />2. Estimates of the current (1975) supply of water. <br /> <br />3. Results of the volumetric adequacy analysis which compares. <br />requirements against supplies to determine relative r:12..gni- <br />tudes of deiiciencies. <br /> <br />.L A description of the Central Case condition3 of national and <br />regional economic development, C\.:-..d a description of the e[i.::cts <br />of the Central Case on rcgion2.1 development, environn1t..-~nL:tl <br />quality, and social well-bein;. <br /> <br />5. Clearly stated assumption.; supporting the Central Case pr0jectloc,3, <br />supplies, adequacy analysi3, and Central Case efiects. <br /> <br />6. Projections of non-\-ohunt;tric requiremc;Its for 197:;, 198~. and <br />2000 based on C~ntr"l Case aS3umptions. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />/. Compari3ons of C(~ntr<:Ll C:j.S,~ \-oluInetric pr-)jcctions .::nrl. :-~~k:Yl..~a,->-'~:: <br />':"'._~12.i:1:.:i~ proj.:;ctio;1S made: in State/ rcg:iunal ~Ll.~c1i,~:,;. <br />