My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09324
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 9:48:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:34:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.200.60
Description
Basin Multi-State Organizations - Missouri River Basin Commission - Reports
Date
1/24/1974
Author
Cliff Jochim
Title
States Legal View of January 4, 1974 Federal Position Paper Regarding Water Marketing Policy (North Dakota State Water Commission)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />January 24, 1974 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />the states met In Denver, Colorado, and prepared a response to the Federal <br /> <br />Subcommittee Position Paper. A copy of this State Subcommittee Position <br /> <br />Paper is enclosed. This position paper was presented to the Ad Hoc Committee <br /> <br />on January 18, 1974 at which time it was agreed to suggest that the deadline <br /> <br />to develop a unified state/federal position be extended to July 1, 1974, an <br /> <br />extension of five months rather than the six months referred to in the State <br /> <br />Subcommittee Position Paper. This extension to July 1, 1974 has since been <br /> <br />approved. <br /> <br />The purpose of this memo is to request that each of the ten basin <br /> <br />states bring an attorney to the February 5-7, 1974 Kansas Citv meetinQ of <br /> <br />the Missouri River Basio Commission. The attorneys will meet with the <br /> <br />states durinQ their caucus on February 5. 1974 at 8:00 p.m. in the Wyandotte <br /> <br />Room of the Ramada lon, Center City Plaza. Another room io which the attorneys <br /> <br />may meet has been reserved in the event it is decided we should meet separately <br /> <br />while the states are caucussing. <br /> <br />Our prime immediate objective, as I see it, is to review the Federal <br /> <br />Subcommittee Position Paper and the Report of the legislative Technical <br /> <br />Group to the Ad Hoc Committee in order to determine the states' separate <br /> <br />and joint positions relative thereto. This is not to infer that the two <br /> <br />other technical group papers are not worthy of our study - they are as they <br /> <br />definitely raise legal questions with which we must conteod. We must, however, <br /> <br />begin with the most obvious legal issues - those contained in the legislative <br /> <br />Technical Group Report and the Federal Subcommittee Position Paper. I am, <br /> <br />therefore, enclosing copies of all three technical group reports. <br /> <br />also suggest that we all familiarize ourselves with the Flood Control <br /> <br />Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 887); Senate Document No. 191, 78th Congress, 2d Session; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.