Laserfiche WebLink
<br />('1:'h'2 n'H,eHng is resurnedo.t 9,00 A.M., May 2, 1947 <br />at the Co:aal Room of the 1';1 Rancho Vegas Hotel) <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />r- ~ <br /> <br />MR,MATTHEW.: Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen, <br />yesterday when we adjourned, I believe that we had completed the <br />comments by the State of Nevada. There are no representatives from <br />~rizona here. so that just by way of reviewing the Arizona report, we <br />might go through the summary. <br /> <br />'-'~~ <br /> <br />Arizona views .the report 'lS an inventory of possible projects, <br />and indicates that further investigation will be necessary before the Bureau <br />would be in a position to recommend authorization for construction. With <br />respect to the Bureau's recommendation on selection ofprojeds, the <br />Arizona comments state that it is now desirable and possible for each <br />of the States in the Basin to recommend for construction projects within <br />that State for which the stream flow depletions will assuredly be within <br />the allocation of r,olorado River Water, which has been made to that <br />State, or which will be made to that State. <br /> <br />Then Arizona proceeds to state that it is now poosible and <br />desirable to make a sub-compact for allocation amoIlg the respective <br />States of the Upper Basin. and, coming to the Lower Basin, her comments <br />state that the apportionment among the States of the Lower Basin of the <br />water apportioned to the Lower Basin by the Colorado River Compact, has <br />beeu affected by the Colorado River Compact, the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Act. the Cl>,Hfornia Limitation Act, the Mel<ican Treaty, the contract between <br />the United States and the State of Arizona, the contract between the United <br />States and the State of Nevada, and the contracts between the United <br />States and the agencies of the State of California, In other words. Arizona <br />takes the position that no sub-compact is necessary in the Lower Basin, <br />that the mattei' is decided by those various instrum.ents. <br /> <br />Arizona then proceeds to set forth what Arizona is entitled <br />to under those instruments, as she interprets them, stating that: <br /> <br />"The Colorado River Compact (Article ill (a) and (b) <br />apportions to the Lower Basin eight and one-half million <br />acre feet of water annually in perpetuity. In consideration <br />of the passage of the Boulder Canyon Project Act and its <br />becoming effective. the legislature of California adopted <br />the California Limitation Act (Cahpter 16, California <br />Statutes 19Z9) as required by the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Act, which Act limits California's use of water of the <br />Colorado River irrevocably and unconditionally, and for <br />the benefit of Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New M'exico, <br />Utah and Wyoming to 4,400,000 acre feet of the eight and <br />one-half million feet apportioned to the Lower Basin, in <br />perpetuity, for use each year by the Colorado River Compact. <br /> <br />-45- <br /> <br />i; <br />