Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />002085 <br /> <br />4.0 RESOURCE RISKS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The noxious weed survey for Williams Fork Project was conducted to aid in identifying <br />and assessing potential resource risks associated with continued operation of the <br />Williams Fork Project. As noted above, although the overall impression of the Williams <br />Fork Project vegetation is that it is relatively pristine, noxious weeds and common weeds <br />were encountered at disturbed areas including the project public access sites and in <br />specific moist grassy areas and wet meadow habitat types at the project. Resource risks <br />associated with these situations and other noxious weed issues specifically identified <br />during scoping are discussed below, and summary weed management recommendations <br />are provided, <br /> <br />4.1 Campgrounds/Boat Launches <br /> <br />Two species of noxious weeds encountered at the Williams Fork Project (Canada thistle <br />and yellow toadflax) are abundant at the two of the three campgroundlboat launch sites, <br />including the east and west campgroundlboat launch sites discussed above, Two other <br />noxious weed species (houndstongue and musk thistle) occur at these facilities at low <br />frequencies, Both of these access sites also support a variety of common weeds. The <br />occurrence of weeds at these recreation sites is related to removal of native vegetation <br />and disturbance of soils associated with the high degree of pedestrian and vehicular use <br />of these sites. <br /> <br />The resource risk associated with the presence of these noxious weeds is primarily to the <br />quality of these sites in terms of public enjoyment and aesthetics, An attendant resource <br />risk is the potential for spread of these weeds by seed from these sites to other currently <br />disturbed sites or to additional sites that may be disturbed in the future, <br /> <br />It is recommended that noxious weeds be controlled at the east and west <br />campgroundlboat launch public access sites. The Williams Fork caretaker staff has been <br />or will be trained and certified to apply herbicides, Having certified applicators on site <br />throughout the growing season will allow for noxious weed control activities to take <br />place during the appropriate season, under appropriate weather conditions, and in a <br />timely manner, Herbicide application protocols necessary to protect public health should <br />to be implemented when treating these public access sites. Spot treatment with selective <br />broad leaf herbicides is recommended for small infestations to preserve as much of the <br />associated non-target vegetation, and thus soil cover, as possible, Heavily infested areas <br />may need to be treated a number of times due to long-lived propagules of some species or <br />due to large weed seed reservoirs in the soil. Likewise, large treated areas may need to <br />undergo active reclamation/revegetation activities in order to minimize erosion of bare <br />soils and to prevent reinvasion of these areas by the same or other weeds, Such areas will <br />need to be evaluated through time. <br /> <br />Decisions about also controlling common weeds at these sites will need to consider <br />tradeoffs between making the sites as weed-free as possible and maintaining the soil <br /> <br />Williams Fork Reservoir <br />Hydroelectric Project <br />January 2004 <br /> <br />Steiger.; CorporatIOn <br />Noxiou!o Weed Survey Report <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />