My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09240
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:52:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:32:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.290
Description
Wild and Scenic - Great Sand Dunes National Monument
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
9/1/1972
Author
National Park Servic
Title
Wilderness Recommendation - Great Sand Dunes National Monument - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000103 <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />As required by the Wilderness Act, public hearings were held on the <br />preliminary Great Sand Dunes proposal at Alamosa, Colorado, on July <br />1, 1970. Notice of the hearings appeared in the Federal Register and in <br />local Colorado papers on May 2, 1970. About 127 persons attended the <br />hearing, and 48 oral statements were presented. A total of 521 letters <br />were received. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Of the agencies, private organizations, and individuals testifying or <br />submitting written views, four of 14 public agencies, three of 39 private <br />organizations, and 282 of 961 individuals supported the preliminary <br />wilderness proposal. Thirty-two of the 39 private organizations and 613 <br />of the 961 individuals commenting favored a larger wilderness. Two <br />public agencies, two private organizations, and 62 individuals favored <br />wi Iderness with no specific recommendations. Two public <br />agencies - the Boards of Commissioners for Alamosa and Costilla <br />Counties - three private organizations, and three individuals opposed <br />the establishment of wilderness. Acknowledgements were received from <br />six public agencies and one individual who had no specific comments. <br /> <br />The alternative proposals presented at the public hearings are described in <br />the appended Hearing Officer's Report and are indicated in Exhibit D. <br /> <br />After careful study of the oral and written statements and the further <br />consideration of management needs, the following revisions to the <br />preliminary wilderness proposal are recommended. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.