My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09221
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:52:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:32:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.425
Description
Wild and Scenic - Piedra River
State
CO
Basin
Western Slope
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1991
Author
Julie Stromberg Dunc
Title
Instream Flow Requirements for Cottonwoods at Bishop Creek - Inyo County - California
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />aon079 <br /> <br />k' <br /> <br />commonality in growth pattern between <br />reaches. <br />Univariate regression analysis was used <br />to explore relationships between annual <br />ring width from 1969 to 1988 and the fol. <br />lowing variables: (1) volume of streamflow <br />during the water-year and during the <br />growing season (May-October), (2) prior- <br />year flow volume during the water-year <br />and during the growing season, (3) pre- <br />cipitation during the water-year and grow- <br />ing season, (4) average maximum temper- <br />ature during the growing season and <br />during individual months, and (5) prior- <br />year ring width. Stt'pwise multiple regres- <br />sion analysis was then used to develop <br />reach-specific models that predicted an- <br />nual ring width of the cottonwoods from <br />the most appropriate variables. Prior-year <br />ring width was included as a variable be- <br />cause it serves as a biotic integrator of pri- <br />or-year environmental conditions (Strom- <br />berg and Patten 1990). Average volume of <br />flow was selected as the instream flow vari- <br />able over parameters such as the instan- <br />taneous minima (Kulik 1990) because most <br />riparian trees can withstand short periods <br />of drought. Flow data for reach 6 were <br />mea!>ured discharge values from power <br />plant 6, whereas flow data for the diverted <br />reaches were estimated based on assump- <br />tions on inputs and losses from overland <br />runolT and other sources, respective to the <br />nearest stream gage (Simons, Li and As- <br />sociates 1990). <br />The iostream models for reaches 2 and <br />5 were calibrated on chronologies devel- <br />oped from randomly selected groups of <br />trees and verified on the other half of the <br />sample (n = 14 and 7, respectively). Pear- <br />son correlations (r) between predicted and <br />actual ring widths were then calculated as <br />within-reach verification statistics (e.g.. <br />Cook and Jacoby 1983). Models for reach <br />4 cottonwoods were not verified due 10 <br />small sample size. The models were also <br />verified between reaches by determining <br />correlation coefficients between ring <br />widths for d given reach and the values <br /> <br />Elevation <br />dbh (em) (m) <br />25:t. 7 2,024 <br />29:t. 9 2.020 <br />29.= 7 2,015 <br />36 ::t II 1,.508 <br />21::t 4 lA68 <br />19::t6 1.465 <br />42:!: 17 1.390 <br />45:!: 22 1.387 <br />50::!: 7 L385 <br />71 ::t 19 1.380 <br />1Cnocllrpll. POFR - P. <br /> <br />the classes mini- <br /> <br />'e mounted and <br />rd methods (Fritts <br />~ between sped- <br />"ere rneasu red to <br />ng an automated <br />:ing-width chra- <br />for each tree bv <br />or the two repli- <br />individual trft's <br />~o a value of 1 to <br />rowth due to age <br />~d titting a curve <br />,ronology and di- <br />ing width by the <br />he curve. Reach <br />Ited by averaging <br />,ogies for all ma- <br /> <br />~ ring chronolo- <br />'ar-to-vear varia- <br />:,) was' calculated <br />n coefficients bE-- <br />.vere determined <br />h reach as a mea- <br />commonality in <br />:orrelation coef- <br />mined between <br />measure of the <br /> <br />Instream Flow-Growth Models <br /> <br />DIi.'l'rft.J Rt'Qcllt'5. Growth of trees in the <br />three diverted reaches has varied over time, <br /> <br />January 1991 <br /> <br />I J. C. Stromberg and D. T. Patten <br /> <br />(,) <br /> <br />,,~ <br />a-..1l(./IO<6 <br />1"-AFlu>c"5 <br />1.-.R[.OC>l. <br />.2j"'-Or.u.c>l2 <br />.- <br />I / <br />. -' <br />6~"a--"--'__,,~ <br /> <br />/ <br />. <br />- <br /> <br />. <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />'" ( <br />\ <br />. <br /> <br />" <br />, <br />'- <br />- <br />o <br />~ <br />" <br />o <br /> <br />I <br />A~, <br />o. . . . . . ~/, " <br />OCTOIOVOl:ColAt<FUlw.Il_......y,I)N..IlA.IOlICSEP <br /> <br />, <br />r <br />" <br />r <br />o <br />> <br /> <br />( <br />,- <br /> <br />I') '''~. . I <br />" "" /\ ( <br /> <br />: ::1., .~. IVV' \^ I <br />:1 ../ \/ '. '. <br />,:L~~~tv~hJ <br />~~1'nnu~H71nn~81~uB.~UB7~ <br />",...rtR1'Uo'I <br /> <br />" <br />o <br />, <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />FIGURE 2. ,..II"~nmonthJy(A}~nd~nnu~118) <br />strt'~mflows in th~ w~t~r;y~~r for 1969-1988 <br />~t four r~~ch~s on Bishop Creek. <br /> <br />predicted by instream models developed <br />for a different reach. <br />Univariate regression analysis was used <br />to develop predictive equations relating <br />tree canopy vigor to average ring width <br />over the last 10, 15, or 20 years, assuming <br />that present-day vigor reflects a composite <br />and time-lagged response to past growth <br />rate of the trees. This was done for each <br />reach (using tree values) and for the study <br />area as a whole (using site means). Multi- <br />variate regression equations were devel- <br />oped relating site mortality (dead trees as <br />percent of the total) to average site ring <br />width for 1969-1988 and average age of <br />the cottonwood trees in the stand. This was <br />done after statistically adjusting ring width <br />values to reflect that of a 35-year-old tree <br />b)' using curve.titting techniques (Fritts <br />1976). Tree age was calculated as the num- <br />l:>er of annual rings plus estimated time to <br />grow to coring height: 2 years at reaches 5 <br />and 6, and 4 years elsewhere. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />as evidenced by high values for mean sen- <br />sitivity of the chronologies (Table 2) and <br />as seen graphically in Figure 3. Ring-width <br />chronologies generally were highly cor- <br /> <br />5 II~, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.