|
<br />~each
<br />
<br />1 the supplemented-
<br />nced by localized, in-
<br />This is indicated by
<br />between tree chro-
<br />reach and the lack of
<br />models for the reach
<br />1989). This contrasts
<br />Lches, where one site
<br />'lume. had a primary
<br />growth. Trees in the
<br />each were not limited
<br />,cted given the high
<br />,ased into the stream.
<br />s that may influence
<br />, reach include vary-
<br />.ition over time and
<br />the extent of soil sat-
<br />o conditions. The de-
<br />me trees during very
<br />at prolonged satura-
<br />, growth and vigor of
<br />,. Other human im-
<br />haps including soil
<br />; the old age of most
<br />:ontribute to the low
<br />,ite. The question of
<br />th response of trees
<br />modified. flow-sup-
<br />'ares to that of trees
<br />)wing streams awaits
<br />
<br />JGMENTS
<br />
<br />lifornia Edison, Incor-
<br />ancial support and hy-
<br />, go to three reviewers
<br />~ws of the manuscript.
<br />
<br />o as reconstructed
<br />'2.
<br />
<br />variations in past
<br />-144.
<br />~ impact of water
<br />and S. J. SaLtveit,
<br />
<br />nd riparian vegc-
<br />California, USA.
<br />
<br />ment on riparian
<br />l.1anagement 11(4):
<br />
<br />January 1991
<br />
<br />~L)[)OS5
<br />
<br />Hess, J. W., and S. D. Smith. 1987. Isotopic analysis of Bishop Creek hydrology and vegetation
<br />water sources. Pages 6-8 in D. Patten. editor. Sierran riparian confermce procudings. Pleas-
<br />anton, CA.. Available from: Duncan Patten, Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona
<br />State University.
<br />Kondolf, G. M., J. W. Webb, M. J. Sale, and T. Felando. 1987. Basic hydrologic studies for
<br />assessing impacts of flow diversions on riparian vegetation: Examples from streams of
<br />the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environmental Management 11(6):757-769.
<br />Kulik, B. H. 1990. A method to refine the New England aquatic base flow policy. Rivers 1(1):
<br />8-22.
<br />Nilsson, C. 1984. Effects of stream regulation on riparian vegetation. Pages 93-106 in A.
<br />Lillehammer and S. J. Saltveit, editors. Regulated rivers. New York: Columbia University
<br />Press.
<br />Pritchard, D. F., and L. Rosenman. 1989. Planning for future hydroelectric power: A myth?
<br />Pages 158-165 in G. R. Baumli, editor. Legal, institutional, financial, and environmental aspects
<br />of water issues. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
<br />Risser, R. J.,and R. R. Harris. 1989. Mitigation {or impacts to riparian vegetation on western
<br />montane streams. Pages 235-252m J. A. Gore and G. E. Petts, editors. Alternatives En regulated
<br />river managmle1lt. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
<br />Simons, Li and Associates, Incorporated. 1990. Evaluation of stream channel processes and
<br />the growth of riparian vegetation, Bishop Creek, California. Report to Southern California
<br />Edison, Rosemead, CA.
<br />Smith, S., and J. Nachlinger. 1987_ Water relations of riparian vegetation along Bishop Creek
<br />and North Fork Kings River, Sierra Nevada, California. Report to Southern California
<br />Edison, Rosemead, CA.
<br />Smith, S. D., J. L. Nachlinger, A. B. Wellington, and C. A. Fox. 1989. Water relations of
<br />obligate riparian plants as a function of streamflow diversion on the Bishop Creek wa-
<br />tershed. Pages 360-365 in D. L. AbelL technical coordinator. California riparian system.s
<br />conference: ProtectlOlI, managemerlt and res/oration for the 1990s. U.S. Forest Service (General
<br />Technical Report PSW-II0).
<br />Smith, W. B. 1990. The controversial effects of instream flow determinations. Ril.'er~ 1(1):3-5.
<br />Space, M. L., J. Hess, and S. D. Smith. 1989. Hydrology of Bishop Creek, California: An
<br />isotopic analysis. Pages 349-351 in D. L. Abell, technical coordinator, Califorma riparian
<br />systems conference: ProtectIOn, management and Yt'storatwn for the 19905. U.S. Forest Service
<br />(General Technical Report PSW-IIO).
<br />Stine, S., D. Gaines, and P. Vorster. 1984. Destruction of riparian 'systems due to water
<br />development in the Mono Lake watershed. Pages 528-533 in R. E. Warner and K. M.
<br />Hendrix, editors. Califomia riparian system.s: Ecology, consen'ation, and productive management.
<br />Berkeley: University of California Press.
<br />Stromberg, J. c., and D. T. Patten. 1989. Early recovery of an eastern Sierra Nevada riparian
<br />system after forty years of stream diversion. Pages 399-404 111 D. L. Abell. technical
<br />coordinator. California riparian systems coniermce: Protection, manasemenf and restoratIOn for
<br />tile 19905. U.s. Forest Service (General Technical Report P5W-llO).
<br />-, aod -. 1990. Riparian vegetation instream flow requirements: A case study from
<br />a diverted stream in the eastern Sierra Nevada, Cali forma, USA. Elw/ronmental Management
<br />]4(2):]85-194.
<br />Walsh, K., R. Bowen, and H. Skibitzke. 1987. Aerial photograph interpretation of riparian
<br />vegetation/geomorphology relations on Bishop Creek. Pages 2-5 in D. Patten, editor.
<br />Sierran riparian conference proceedings. Pleasanton, CA. Available from: Duncan Patten,
<br />Center for Environmental Studies, Arizona State Umversity.
<br />Williams, G. P., and M. G. Wolman. 1984. DOW'lstYt'am effects (If Jams 011 a/ftwial r;11Cr5. Wash-
<br />ington, DC: U.S. Geological Sorvey (Professional Paper 1286).
<br />
<br />Rt'cdl!eJ. 1~ Mall 1990
<br />Accepted: 15 Scpt('ntb~r 199U
<br />Di:;Cll~siOlr VPl'lI Imtll 1 AlIgust /991
<br />
<br />II II~
<br />
<br />J. C. Stromberg and D. T. Patten
<br />
|