My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09212
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:31:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.600
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/26/1987
Author
Gardner and Young
Title
Assessing Strategies for Control of Irrigation-Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Econorr1c Eff1ciencv of "'ternat1ve Control Stratec:1es. <br /> <br />o <br />o The linear program was first solved to establish the bener-marl< (no <br />c.." <br />......:..- salinity control) scenario (table 2. Part A. Ro.. ll. Annual net retums to land <br /> <br />and water are an estimated S2.S22.000 for the entire stud)' area. This a/l'lOunts <br /> <br />to Just over SSO per acre average net return. <br /> <br />The base solution rec;uires <br /> <br />222.250 acre-feet of 1rrigatfon water resulting in 237.350 tons of salt <br /> <br />discharged into the river via deep percolaticn and ffeld ditch seepage. This <br /> <br />figure is similar to the earl fer estimates of both SCS and Leathers and Young. <br /> <br />Policy fnstruments or strategies for reducing the emissions of water <br /> <br />pollutants include administratively-set incentives (subsidies or taxes), <br /> <br />marketable effluent permits and most commonly. direct controls en emttter <br /> <br />behavior (Bohm and Russell). <br /> <br />Three basic types of control strategies were <br /> <br />tested: 1) 1rrigation system subsidies. 2) effluent taxes on salt dfscharges. <br /> <br />ana 3) taxes on 1rr1gat1on water. ("influent" taxes). <br /> <br />Variations and <br /> <br />combinations of these were also examined. <br /> <br />Definition of Net Social Cost. <br /> <br />Net social cost of salinity control 1s <br /> <br />expressed in annual terms to fnclude the annualized capital c:ost of on-farm <br /> <br />imp rovements. plus 1 ncome fo regone from p roduc:tion changes. adjusted by <br /> <br />credit1ng the value of irrigation labor saved.6 <br /> <br />Alternatively stated. net <br /> <br />cosu to upstream farmers plus the government's cost equals the net social <br /> <br />cost:. The cost to one group can exceed net social cost ff the other group is <br /> <br />subsidized by the policy. <br /> <br />Net farm income foregone from production changes may 1nclude that from <br /> <br />cropp 1 n9 pattern adjustments and 1 and rat 1 rement. <br /> <br />The cost of add1t1onal <br /> <br />overtin:e labor (based on the market wage rate) for frr1gation is also a scc1al <br /> <br />cost. <br /> <br />Capital cost subsidies and taxes on salt or water, hewever, are <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.