My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09211
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:31:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management-
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2005
Author
Wiele-Torizzo
Title
Modeling of Sand Deposition in Archaeologically Significant Reaches of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00641 <br /> <br />Modelling of sand deposition in Colorado River 389 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />without significant recirculation zones, sand was stored in narrow bands along the <br />channel sides under most conditions, primarily in the lee of channel irregularities. <br />Sand volumes deposited above the 708 mJls stage in the Lower Tanner reach and in <br />the critical right bank region (J) in the Upper Unkar reach were, at best, half the <br />deposit volumes in the Above Lava Chuar and Palisades recirculation zones. Recir- <br />culation zones appear more consistent in response to increased discharge and vari- <br />ations in sand supply, and store more sediment for a given reach length. Trends in <br />overall sand storage in reaches dominated by recirculation zones can be generalized, <br />but in reaches where sand storage is dependent on liner-scale morphology of the <br />channel sides, the trends are more variable. <br /> <br />High discharge releases. Higher flows, such as the 2830mJ{s flow, tend to deposit <br />sand in sheltered areas even with low sand supply. This is especially evident in the <br />two upstream reaches in this study. Higher water discharges are significantly more <br />elTective in depositing sand in critical areas than lower discharges. This is a result of <br />the greater sand transport rate for given sand conditions and, perhaps more sig- <br />nificantly, the larger accommodation spaces created by higher stages. <br /> <br />High-flow duration. Deposition rate depends strongly on the volume of sand already <br />present at a depositional site. Deposition rate falls rapidly as the site fills. As a result, <br />high flows are most effective within the Iirst day or two in filling depositional sites. <br />Longer-duration high releases distribute sand more thoroughly within a depositional <br />site, as pointed out by Anima elal. (1998), but are less efficient at utilizing sand in <br />transport. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Sand supply. High sand concentrations, such as would occur during significant <br />tributary flow, would be most effective in forming significant deposits in critical <br />areas. The possibility and potential advantages of dam releases timed to coincide or <br />shortly follow tributary flows were considered by the authors of the EIS (US <br />Department of Interior, 1995), and were reiterated by Lucchitta and Leopold <br />(1999) with particular emphasis on flows in the Little Colorado River. Careful <br />analyses of sand deposits, sand transport processes and suspended sand measure- <br />ments (Rubin etal., 1998; Topping "0/., 2000a,b) have provided a process-based <br />explanation of the importance of tributary inputs to replenishing sand resources, <br />especially those in Marble Canyon that rely primarily on the sand inputs from the <br />Paria River, and a quantification of the potentia! benefits of high releases associated <br />with tributary inputs. Releasing high flows during or shortly following significant <br />tributary flows would also increase the supply of fine-grained sediment, which would <br />increase the stability of the deposits (as pointed out by Richard Hereford, USGS, <br />oral communication, 1998). High discharges increase the total volume of the deposit <br />and place the sand higher up lhe channel bank and, therefore, would place a larger <br />volume within the gully mouths. <br />It is important to note that these study sites are in a relatively sand-rich reach <br />compared with the channel above the confluence with the Little Colorado River. <br />High discharges may deposit sand at many sites in this region, even with a low sand <br />supply; but upstream of the confluence wilh the Little Colorado River, the lower <br />sand supply in the absence of significant flow in the Paria River would make that <br />reach more vulnerable to erosion (Schmidt, 1999; Topping elal., 2000a,b). <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.-.-..' <br />:"'f:-' <br />:l,...-". <br />'1:; <br />r', <br />L;;t~., <br />.... ~"'; <br />'~:1- <br />". <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.