Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... <br /> <br />368 Computational FllIid Dynamics <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br /> Sand discharge e <br /> . Low sand supply <br /> . Intermediate sand supply . <br />r 0 . High sand supply <br />... '. <br /> . <br />.. <br />r . Grain size <br /> o low sand supply L:. <br />~ <- Intermeaiate sand supply <br />. ~ High sand supply <br /> <br />0.30 . <br />0.25 <br /> E <br /> g <br /> " <br />0.20 N <br />in <br /> " <br /> '" <br /> i5 <br />0.15 <br /> <br />~ <br />110 <br />" <br />'" <br />~ <br />i;l <br />o <br />" <br />" <br />'" <br />rJl <br /> <br />0.1 I <br />1000 1500 <br />1270 <br /> <br />2000 2500 <br /> <br />0.10 <br />3000 <br />2830 <br /> <br />Water discharge (mJ/s) <br /> <br />Figure 14.4 S~lnd discharge Jnel grain size as functions of waler discharge lor three sand <br />conditions u!ied as boundary conditions for the model runs: high sand supply during 1956, <br />;ntermedi,lte !i.md .wpply repr~!iented by the conditions during the 1996 test ,Jaw Clnd low <br />.(,and supply dllrin.~ 1983. The.f;e VJJut'~ for sand discharge clnd grain ...ize were contributed by <br />Tvpping fUSGS, written commllnication, /998J. <br /> <br />representative of historical high sand supplies. historical low sand supplies and an <br />intermediate condition corresponding to that which occurred during the 1996 test <br />tlow. The historical high sand supply corresponds to conditions represented by <br />measurements in 1956. prior to the dam construction. Th~ historical low was taken <br />from sand conditions in 1983. after the dam had been eliminating main channel <br />inputs for nearly 20 years and during flows approaching 2830 m.l/s. These two <br />conditions, high discharge and low sediment supply. combined to winnow the bed <br />to a Coarser state and thereby reduce suspended sand transport (Topping etal.. <br />2000a,b). The 1996 sand conditions are representative of typical <:ontemporary <br />conditions. The llpstream sand boundary conditions corresponding to the three <br />sand sllpplies were taken from sand rating curves supplied by David J. Topping <br />(liS Geological Survey. written communication. 1998). Topping 11997) related sand <br />concentralions and sand sizes to antecedent conditions and the evolving status of sand <br />on the channel bed. which forms the source from which sand in suspension is derived. <br />One of the initial conditions that must be specified is the sand coverage on the bed <br />at the start of the simulation. Previous model applications have been in reaches in <br />"hich bathymetric measurements have been repeated. allowing for tbe estimation of <br />a minimum bed elevation by combining the lowest elevations from different surveys. <br />Another approach in modelling events in which the change in sand deposits is <br />dominantly depositional. and where there is insufficient information to synthesize <br />a minimum bed elevation, is to neglect erosion and make the starting bed shape the <br />minimum hed elevation. In this study. the local initial sand conditions on the bed <br />were estimated by running the model in each reach at a discharge characteristic of <br />dam operation 1~81 m'is was chosen for these simulations) with a sand boundar~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />