WSP09208 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

;:;'002'264 -2- Under decis ions of the Supreme Court of the United States (reoent armolIDce- ments being the New River and Red River decisions" United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 311 U, s. 377, and Oklahoma v. atkinson, 313 U.s. 508), navigation and flood-control works and the control of water by them, are in the interests of interstate oOlllllleroe and subject to the exoluaive oontrol of the Federal government. This policy statement whioh insures paramount proteotion to navigation and flood-oontrol on the Arkansas river where in its upper basin irrigation is extensively praotioed, makes irrigation uses under any plan of development, subservient to those which are olaimed by the Federal government under the above deoisions to be under its oontrol. The report and reoommendations, dated Ootober, 1943, of a Committee of the National Reclama.tion Assooiati on, approved at the armual oonvention of the as- s ooia ti on in lSi/3, reoanmend as foll ows I "1. That the control, regulation and utilization of water in the arid and semi-arid areas of the United states be in aooord with the prinoiple that the highest use shall be for domestio oonsumption and for growing oropsJ that multiple-use or power projeots shall be so designed and operated that domestio and irrigation needs shall at all times be ?lramount to the requirements of hydroeleotrio energy pro- duotion; and that the imposition of federal jurisdiotion IIDder the COIIllIIBroe Clause to maintain navigable os.paoity and regulate floods in lower reaohes of rivers having their souroes in the arid and semi- arid region, should reoognhe the maximum use of water for irrigation, pm:poses. " "2. That appropriate steps be taken to resist resort to the Commeroe Clause of the Federal Constitution, through varioua legis- lative enaotments and a 'liberal oonstruotion thereof by judioial de- orees, as a means of imposing oomplete federal oontrol of water ,re- , souroes in disregard of applioable state water laws." . . . * .... "5. That in the interests of eoonomy, avoidanoe of dupli- oation of effort and the attainment of the highest use of the limited water resouroe of the "Iest for all benefioial purposes, the states seek through aotion of the Congress, or by other effeotive means, to obtain the oorrelat'ion of the aotivities of all depart- ments, bureaus and agenoies of the Government engaged in water de- velopment and flood oontrol, "6. That in the formulation of plans for basin development and in the authorization of speoifio projects, steps be taken to in- sure both the reoognition of applioable state laws and the appropriate ooordination of federal and state jurisdiotions over the watera in- volved in suoh plans or projeots." "7. T!-e-t to 'assure the most effioient use of v.e.ters for multi- ple purposes, to provide for amioable division of waters among atates, to remove all oauses, present and future, whioh might lead to oontro-