My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09197
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:30:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8270.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Water Quality/Salinity -- Misc Water Quality
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1981
Author
USDOI
Title
Quality of Water - Colorado River Basin - Progress Report No. 10 - January 1981 -- Part 2 of 2 -- Part X - page 99 through end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />",.... <br />..... <br />CJ1 <br />",,'l. <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SPECIAL STUDIES (continued) <br /> <br />Green and Colorado Rivers. This large region was divided into nine sub- <br />regions or basins. Data were collected on streamflow, conductivity, and <br />water Quality through chemical analyses. Measurements were taken in <br />December and January when streamflow was at a low level, made up primarily <br />by ground water discharge. Cold temperatures at this time of year would <br />have made surface runoff from melting snow very unlikely, and there was <br />no observed rainfall. The volume of irrigation returnflow should also <br />have been at a minimum. Measurements were not taken as a part of this <br />study in areas where adequate data existed as a result of previous studies, <br />as, for example, the Piceance Basin oil shale investigations. <br /> <br />The area covered by this investigation yields 74 percent of the <br />water and 77 percent of the salt contributed by the Upper Basin. The <br />measured ground water contribution to the total annual salt load of this <br />part of the Upper Basin was 55 percent. However, the ground contributed <br />by each of the nine subbasins varied considerably, from a low of 30 percent <br />in the Upper Green River Basin, to a high of 93 percent in the Lower <br />Colorado River headwaters. In general, the percent of total salt load <br />contributed by ground water was higher for subbasins in the Colorado <br />River Region, an average of 69 percent, than for subbasins in the Green <br />River Region, an average of only 38 percent. <br /> <br />The Upper Colorado Headwaters subbasin is an area of high mountain <br />country on the west slopes of the Cootinental Divide. The geologic <br />formations are classed as slightly saline to nonsaline. The soils are <br />Inceptisols, Alfisols, and Mollisols which are normally low in salts or <br />have been leached by virture of their location at higher elevations. <br /> <br />Vegetation is alpine tundra, conifers, mountain scrub, and meadow- <br />lands. Salt concentration in runoff would be very low. This subbasin <br />produces 28 percent of the total water for the study region and only 16 <br />percent of the total salt load. However, the subbasin accounts for 26 <br />percent of the total salt contributed from ground water. Of the salt <br />produced by the subbasin, 87 percent ComeS from the ground water yielded by <br />the Eagle Valley Evaporate Formation and from Glenwood and Dotsero Hot <br />Springs. Point source salt contributions can be very significant. The <br />Water and Power Resources Service estimates that 500,000 tons (450 000 t) <br />of salt, or nearly one half of the total subbasin salt load, are <br />produced annually by the Glenwood and Dotsero Springs. <br /> <br />The effect of irrigation returnflow on the salt load from ground <br />water during the base flow period (winter) is very small for most sub- <br />basins, especially those at high elevations. Soila being irrigated <br />are the alluvial, relatively well-drained deposits along streams. The <br />distance ground water (irrigation returnflow) must travel before entering <br />a stream channel are in most cases, relatively short. Therefore, water <br />quality data collected in December or January should reflect a minimal <br />influence from irrigated agriculture. However, the large blocks of farm- <br />land located on fine-textured, poorly drained soils, and/or at long <br />distances from streams can have a great influence on ground water. Exam- <br />ples of these would be the Uinta and Price River Basins in Utah, the Lower <br />Gunnison and Grand Valley Projects in Colorado, and the Eden-Farson Project <br />in Wyoming. <br /> <br />117 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.