Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Plan A provides the largest amount of water to irrigate 6,100 acres of land and provide 3,300 <br />acre. feet of fishery water. In addition to MVIC water, 2,000 acre.feet is purchased from Project <br />M&L Plans B and C provide the same amount of water for irrigation and fishery but MVIC <br />water is provided in different methods, Plan D assumes MVIC is either not willing to provide <br />water or the DWCD decides to proceed prior to a final agreement with MVIC; half of the <br />requested fishery water can be provided and about 1,000 acres of irrigated land, Plan E assumes <br />that MVIC is water is available immediately but the fishery water is not available because either <br />fishery funds are not available or Plateau Reservoir construction is delayed for some reason <br />(insufficient runoff, environmental compliance, etc,), <br /> <br />The development costs range from $21,256,000 for Plan A to $4,278,000 for Plan E, These <br />costs are comparable for evaluation of the alternatives; however, the costs will change as detailed <br />information is developed for the facilities, Plans Band C are about $11,000,000 each; Plan B is <br />slightly less costly because ofthe MVIC water lease assumptions, <br /> <br />Plan A involves the most assumptions and pushes the water and funding resources beyond the <br />available amounts, The primary reason for the high cost is inclusion of Sharps Creek Reservoir <br />solely for irrigation; if Sharps Creek Reservoir could also be used for delivery of San Juan <br />County, Utah water so that the costs could be shared, this plan would have improved feasibility, <br /> <br />Plans B, C, D and E are all workable, Either of Plans B and C are workable and primarily <br />depend upon negotiations with MVIC. Plan D works without MVIC or could be a first stage <br />while negotiating with MVIC. Plan E works without the fishery component or could be a first <br />stage while attempting to finalize plans for new storage, <br /> <br />In order to progress towards a plan, the preparation of a feasibility study in cooperation with the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board is recommended, The general work tasks include: <br /> <br />. Pursue technical studies of Plateau Dam and Reservoir to determine if the facilities can be <br />constructed, <br />. Continue negotiations with MVIC to obtain a water supply and/or storage in existing <br />reservoirs, <br />. Develop plans to serve specific tracts of irrigated lands and assess farmers willingness to <br />participate. Pump and pipeline layouts would be prepared, <br />. Work with the fishery interests to obtain funding for the fishery water. <br />. Continue to formulate alternative plans utilizing the various components and select a plan, <br />. Develop a financial plan with the CWCB to fund the project. Goal of a construction loan to <br />be included in the CWCB FY2002 (beginning July, 2001) budget. <br />. Prepare a feasibility report by September, 2000 as a basis for the CWCB loan request. <br />. Prepare environmental analysis on the facilities and submit environmental compliance <br />documents concurrently with feasibility report, <br /> <br />FS ~ f- <br />