Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c!)~! 3'J <br /> <br />In pollution discharged, degree of treatment and type of secondary process <br /> <br />Degree % % <br />at 1940 1945 1949 1957 Change Change <br />Treatment '45-157 '49-157 <br /> - - <br /> Number ot Plants <br />Minor 49 60 54 41 -317 -24.1 <br />Primary 2,669 2,629 3,019 2,730 -3.5 -9.6 <br />Intermediate {2630} 96 107 100 2.0 -6.5 <br />Secondary , 2,799 3,050 4,647 66.0 52.4 <br />Total 5,560 5,766 6,230 7,516 29.9 20.7 <br /> Estimated Population Served (Millions) <br />Minor 3.3 4.3 3.9 1.6 -56.4 -51.7 <br />Primary 15.1 17.2 17.2 25.7 49.5" 49.1 <br />Intermediate /22.2} 3.8 3.6 5.6 48.6 54.2 <br />Secondary 21.7 26.1 43.3 100.0 66.1 <br />Total 40.6 47.0 50.8 76.4 63.1 50.5 <br /> <br />2 Secondar treatment is on :ihar rise <br /> <br />tion abatement programs, all of the dat,l <br />ore the subject of a spccial PHS study <br />to be reported at a later date. <br />Table 2 points up the sharp rise in <br />secondary treatment construction since <br />]945. Some 43.3 million persons served <br />by complete treatment represent 57% <br />of the trealed population and 44% of <br />the sewered population (98.4 million). <br />Significantly, there ha\'e been decreases <br />since 1949 in the number of plants in <br />all categories otner than secondary. <br /> <br /> Estimated Population <br /> Type at Treatment Served (Millionsl <br /> ...!lli.. Jill... ~ <br />Chemical Treatment 4.0 5.3 7.3 <br />Activated Sludie 10.5 11.6 25.0 <br />Trickling Filter Standard Rote {8.4 } 6.8 11.3 <br />TricklinQ Filter HiQh Rote 0.7 6.5 <br />intermittent Sand Filter .0.9 1.0 0.9 <br />Applicatian to Land 0.9 1.3 2.0 <br />LOQoons 0.2 2.4 <br />3 Activated slud e is drawing awa <br /> <br />Table 3 gives striking evidence of the <br />increasing popularity of the activated <br />sludge process. But transcendent as its <br />position has become, the greltest per- <br />c.entage increase during 194,-1957 was <br />for lagoons. or stabilization ponds. The <br />lIumber of ponds increased from -!-5 to <br />631; fhe\' are concentmtcd in the <br />smaller communities and the \Vest. <br />Note that the data in T3ble 3 arc <br />Ilot additive. In all the other sum- <br />maries shown. \I/here a plant incorpo- <br /> <br />secondary and sludge handling processes <br /> <br />rates two or more processes, it has been <br />arbitrarily assigned to the predominant <br />tl'pe. In Table 3. the full population <br />of dual process plants has heen assigned <br />in both places. Thus. tot,l of the 1957 <br />columns less chemic<l] tre3tment is -!-S.l <br />million, compared to 43.4 million for <br />st'condarv treatment in T,lb1c 5. The <br />exact population served hy e<"lch type of <br />secondary plant lies somewhere between <br />the two, though much closer to the <br />smaller figure. <br /> <br /> Number Estimated Percent at Number at Est. Pop. <br /> PrOClss Served <br /> pracess of Pop. Served Estimated Plants Usillll (Millions) <br /> Population <br /> Plants (Millions) Served Chlorinotion 2,216 37.8 <br /> - Grit removal 1,~61 51.7 <br />Activated sludge SludQI processsinQ <br /> Mechanical aeration 259 0.9 2.1 <br /> Diffused air 284 20.2 46.5 Septic tonk 1,120 <br /> Others 46 3.7 8.5 Imhoff tanks 2,759 <br />Trickling filters Stage dlQe.tion 272 <br /> Standard rote 1,870 9.3 21.6 Separate digestion 2,790 <br /> High rate 812 6.0 13.8 Drying bed. 5,342 <br />Sand filters 394 0.8 1.9 LaQoons 167 <br />Land application 340 1.0 2.3 Mech. dewoterinQ 197 <br />Oxidotion ponds 430 0.8 1.8 <br />Other' f.. Unknown 212 ~ --.!1. No organized method 1,781 <br />Tofoi 4,647 43.4 100.0 Miscellaneous 226 <br />5 Activated sludge redominates in bi cities 6 Chlorination, rit removal, slud e <br /> <br />Table 5 shows the activated sludge <br />process is used in 589 plants serving <br />24.8 million persons. This type pre- <br />dominates in cities over 25,000 popula- <br />tion. There are considerable differences <br />in process use <llTIong the various basins. <br />For example, in the L<lke Erie basin <br />almost 55% of the plants (by number) <br />are activated sludge, while in the Colo- <br />rado River basin the corresponding fig- <br />ure is only 5.2%. <br /> <br />The diffused air method of actuated <br />sludge is quite uni\'er~<"I1. <br />The figures shown in Table 6 for <br />chlorination comprise 29.5% of all <br />treatment plants and 49.5% of the <br />population served. In 1945, compara- <br />ble qnantities were 21.8% and 34.2%, <br />respectively. The latest figures represent <br />increases of 75.6% in plants ming and <br />136% in population served. <br />For grit rel11ov31, the figures shown <br /> <br />represcnt increases from 1945 to 1957 of <br />107% in number of plants so equipped <br />~1I1d 86% in population served. <br />While 1,781 plants do not report <br />any organized method of sludge de- <br />\\'aterihg. it is probable that some have <br />drying units that have not been re- <br />ported to state officials. The majority <br />01 the 1.781 plants are small Imhoff or <br />septic tank plants. <br />