My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09117
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:28:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Hydrology
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
10/1/1970
Author
Colorado DNR
Title
Preliminary Report on Travel Time and Transit Losses Arkansas River October 1970
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GJJ2J5 <br /> <br />,34 <br /> <br />at least three standard stations along a river for recording dally evapora- <br />tion, precipitation, temperature and wind velocities, the installation of <br />automatic gage height recorders On all intervening ditches and on all tribu- <br />tary streams and visible sources of inflow, and finally additional hydro- <br />graphers for making the large number of stream measurements under varyIng <br />conditions and stages of flow, together with an adequate force to police <br />all headgates. Up to the present, my Department has not had the funds to <br />finance such a study and to put such a program Into effect." <br /> <br />In 1939 and 1940 Mr. G.F. lacey, the Divisional Engineer on the Arkansas <br />river prepared a comp.rehensive Hudy of the administrative problems and pro- <br />cedures concerning reservoir runs from Twin lakes to the Colorado Canal. In <br />his summary conclusions and observa~ions, he states "Numerous attempts have <br />been made to determine the exact amount of loss in transit between Twin lakes <br />and the various main river gaging stations, as the reservoir head passes down <br />the rive r. " <br /> <br />'~hese studies and investigatlons have been helpful, and information has <br />been obtained, which has proven of great value in establishing certain admin- <br />istrative practices and procedures. In my opinion, exact determinations as <br />to loss In transit to the reservoir head In progresslon are Impossible be- <br />cause of the many influencing factors encountered which are beyond control. <br />There are too many variables present in the situation, which tend to obscure <br />the graphic record and maKe objective conclusions difficult." <br /> <br />lacey suggested a l~!o charge for transit loss of reservoir water that <br />was run from Twin lakes to the Colorado Canal. <br /> <br />On pages 35, 36 and 37 of this report is presented a summary of the <br />Sunnyside Park Ditch case which should be of Interest to all water engineers <br />dealing with the Arkansas River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.