My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09117
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:28:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Hydrology
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
10/1/1970
Author
Colorado DNR
Title
Preliminary Report on Travel Time and Transit Losses Arkansas River October 1970
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O'JJtl)4. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE WORK <br /> <br />Special investigative work was undertaken to explore additional tech- <br />niques which might be found useful' in providing basic data for present and <br />future travel time -- transit loss studies. While it was fully realized that <br />this work was of an experimental nature, we bel ieve it provided a great advan- <br />tage in understanding in a practical way, the river's hydraulic properties. <br />Because the final results and conclusions of this report would be dependent <br />upon judgment and basic knowledge of the rIver, it was necessary to have first- <br />hand field experience on the river. Personnel from this office walked, floated, <br />and observed the Arkansas River more than a dozen times during the summer of <br />1970. The most intensive field work was conducted for the May 2, 1970, release <br />from Twin lakes when six people from this office documented that release. <br /> <br />In the course of the experimental work and general surveys of the river, <br />visits were made to the various gaging stations along the river, both those <br />of the State of Colorado and those of the United States Geological Survey. <br />In the reach of the Arkansas River from Turquoise lake to the Nepesta gage <br />downstream of the Colorado Canal, there are a total of 13 gage stations. Of <br />these gages, five are maIntained by the State and eight by the U.S.G.S. In <br />all of these stations, Stevens A-36 recorders are used, which are able to <br />maintain records for periods up to one year. In the field, the State hydro- <br />graphers check their stations once every two weeks and the U.S.G.S. hydro- <br />graphers check every month. Of these 13 gage stations On the river, all are <br />float operated, with the exception of three U.S.G.S. stations which have <br />"bubblers", which are, in e8sence, airl ines subtrerged beneath the stream, <br />pressurized by nitrogen bottles and which drive the recorder through a mercury <br />manometer. Several times during the course of our investIgation, various gaging <br />stations, both float and bubbler type, were found to be Inoperative due to <br />icing or other mechanical problems. In most instances, we observed that the <br />clocks maintained the records at a plus or minus one-half hour accuracy. <br />However, in some instances a two and one-hal f to three-hour error was noted. <br />Considering overall station installations and better than plus or minus five <br />percent, and sometimes ten percent accuracy would be all that could be <br />expected. Some of the State gages are checked once or twice daily to verify <br />their operation. <br /> <br />Some observations and conclusions reached are described beiow. One <br />experiment involved dyeing the first slug of water released from Twin Lakes <br />on May 2. These dye tests proved useful in demonstrating the translatory <br />wave action at the front edge of the release hydrographi that is, it showed <br />that the wave travels faster than the physical water released. It also <br />demonstrated the rapid fill ing of side pools found occasionally along the <br />river and some of the many I imitations of the use of the dye because of tur- <br />bid water. Calculations based on wave travel time ~ersus dye travel time <br />indicate that the wave travels approximately It times tiaster than the dye. <br /> <br />It was observed before the reservoir release that the upper Arkansas <br />had a comparatively clear water whereas the lower Arkansas, below Canon City, <br />was turbid and had a high suspended sol ids content. In the clear reach of <br />the river, it was poss ible to follow the advancing wave front by not ing <br />where turbid water was encountered as the Increased stage in the river caused <br />an increase in suspended sol ids. It took from two to three days for the river <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.