My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09117
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:28:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Hydrology
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
10/1/1970
Author
Colorado DNR
Title
Preliminary Report on Travel Time and Transit Losses Arkansas River October 1970
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OJJ192 <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />-During high discharges downstream of Pueblo, the critical velocity <br />technique can often be used to estimate velocity when sandboils and stand- <br />i ng waves a re noted i nthe stream channe I I nd i cat i ng a ve I oei ty of f I ow of <br />a Froude number of about 1.0. Here the instahility of critical flow is ap- <br />parent with the standing waves, which is further evlcenced by the associated <br />sandboils -- a manifestation of the river attempting to readjust its depth <br />to keep its velocity subcritical. <br /> <br />CHANGE IN STAGE <br /> <br />Transit loss and travel times are related to the change in stage of <br />the river. The most commonly used hydraulic formula for river flow is <br />Manning's equation <br /> <br />Q <br /> <br />A ~ R2/3 SI/2 <br />n <br /> <br />whe re Q is the flow in cfs <br /> A is the area in square feet <br /> n is the Manning roughness coefficient <br /> R Is the hydraulic radius, and <br /> S is the slope of the hydraulic gradient In feet per foot. <br /> <br />The hydraulic radius and the area both have significant effects upon the dis- <br />charge, and both are directly related to the stage. Relatively large Increases <br />In the discharge can result with rather minimal changes In the stage, and it is <br />for this reason that it is not always readily apparent where the transported <br />water is at any given time. <br /> <br />The change in st~e is usually related to the change In surface area of <br />the river, which in turn affects the evaporation rate from the river. Studies <br />indicate that between Granite and Nepesta the average stage increase between <br />200 and 400 cfs is .50 feet where the average increase In stage between 800 <br />and 1,000 cfs is .25 feet. As the discharges rise, the change In stage di- <br />minishes for equal increments of flow. The average total rise in the river <br />from 100 cfs to 1,000 cfs is approximately two feet. <br /> <br />CHANNEL CROSS SECTIONS <br /> <br />The Arkansas River above Canon City is generally a degrading stream and <br />Is generally well Incised in its valley. Even in reaches where there is an <br />evident flood plain, the channel has Incised itself there and is represented <br />by a channel having steep banks. East of Canon City, where the slopes are <br />much more mild and where wide flood plains exist, the normal flow channel is <br />well defined, with the banks ranging in steepness from nearly straight up and <br />down to 1:1 or 2:1 slopes. <br /> <br />The average width of the river above Canon City during a mean summer flow <br />ranges from 80 to 120 feet. Below Canon City the range is between 140 and 210 <br />feet. The steep banks which generally exist along the study reach mean that <br />ordinary increases in river stage do not greatly increase the top width, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.