Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3-WRH washn x x x indicated <br />MAMMOTH CONSTRUCTICN PROJECTS .' <br />The FEA study estimated that if coal transportation on U.S. rail- <br />roads were virtually doubled between now and 1985, mammoth new construc- <br />tion would have to get underway inunediately. Costs for new equipment <br />and trackage ALONE would range from $13-$15 billion. Between 14~16 <br />million tons of steel would be required for such work. ~ese costs do <br />NOT include costs for labor, overhead or contingencies. ']he routes and <br />the railroads operating in the Northern Plains and the West Which would <br />from Billings to <br />be most affected would be from Billings to Chicago andjoenver operated <br />by Burlington-Northern, and from Albuquerque to B1rmington operated by <br />the Atohison, Topeka and santa Fe, the Texas and pacific, and the Illin- <br />ois central: Billings to san Francisco operated by the Burlington North- <br />ern, Union pacific, Southern pacific and Western pacific. ~e Missouri <br />pacific route would be affected by coal coming in from the Lower Appal~ <br />achian area to Kansas city. OVerall, the study said, "the railroads <br />most affected by the new 1985 flows (coal shipments) are the Burlington <br />Northern, Louisville & Nashville and the...santa Fe. FUrther research <br />into the potential impacts on these roads is underway," it said. <br />The West coast and Alaska would need new locations of refinery <br />capacity, new pipelines and shipping facilities to bring in oil and. <br />from <br />gas from the Alaskan North Slope and elsewhere II the Far North and <br />from the OUter Continental Shelf. And, of course, deep water ports <br />would have to be built off the West coast to accollUllOdate the big super- <br />tankers. The inland waterway system would have to be expanded to help <br />move Western coal to Midwestern and Eastern markets. New coal slurry <br />pipelines might also be built to move Western coals to the West Coast, <br />jDTexaS and elsewhere in the Southwest and South and to the Midwest. New <br />pipelines might also have to be built to accommodate shale oil and oth- <br />er types of synthetic fuels, it said, although it is questionable whe- <br />ther much commercial production from these sources will occur by 1985. <br />"In total, the transportation expansion for Project Independence <br />could cost as much as $34 billion dollars and require 40 million tons <br />of steel,. the FEA study indicated. Cost of moving oil and gas down <br />from Alaska to the West Coast will approximate the $15 billion cost~ <br /> <br />0171 <br />