Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FONSI- B~B 11 \fater Works ot Pueblo <br /> <br />July 2000, <br />. ... , <br /> <br />PURPOSE <br /> <br />The purpose of this action is to increase the efficiency of the Board of Water Works' (Board) <br />water supply system, conserve water for municipal uses, and improve the quality of the Board's <br />raw water supply. This action also allows development of a potential water delivery alternative <br />from Pueblo Reservoir to the City of Colorado Springs (Colorado Springs). <br /> <br />NEED <br /> <br />The Board is requesting the use of up to 15,000 acre-feet per year of "if and when" storage for <br />non-project water in Pueblo Reservoir, permission to connect a 84" pipeline to the South Outlet <br />Works, permission to lay a 84" pipeline across Reclamation land, and a conveyance agreement <br />that would allow the passage of non-project water through the South Outlet Works. These <br />actions would improve the efficiency the Board's water system and allow the Board to more <br />efficiently use its water rights. Connection to the South Outlet Works would normally eliminate <br />the need to convey water in the Arkansas River to the Board's Northside Intake, Souths ide <br />Intake (Intakes), and Comanche Pump Station resulting in higher quality water being delivered <br />to the Whitlock Water Treatment Plant. Higher quality water will contribute to lower chemical <br />costs for treatment. The head created by the water behind the dam will also reduce the Board's <br />pumping costs at the Comanche Pump Station and the Whitlock Water Treatment Plant. <br /> <br />Increased summer demand from residential irrigation and fickle weather sometimes work <br />together to produce system inefficiency. Without "if and when" space in Pueblo Reservoir, the <br />Board releases water from the upper basin reservoirs (Clear Creek, Twin Lakes and Turquoise <br />Reservoirs) to meet short-term increases in demand. Travel time for the water from the upper <br />basin reservoirs to the Board's Intakes ranges from 30 to 40 hours. If it rains after water is <br />released from the upper basin reservoirs but before it reaches the Board's Intakes, demand for <br />residential irrigation water decreases dramatically. There is no way to stop this water once it <br />has been released from the upper basin reservoirs for later use unless storage is available <br />between those reservoirs and the Board's Intakes. If there is no storage space, the Board is <br />forced to use that water even though the Board's direct flow rights could have met the demand. <br />As a result, stored water is used unnecessarily and direct flow rights are left in the river. This <br />results in water from the Colorado River Basin being diverted into the Arkansas River basin to <br />replace the released water. Storage at Pueblo Reservoir will allow the Board to use stored <br />water only when necessary. This would allow the Board to manage its water supply more <br />efficiently and could reduce the Board's demand on Colorado River Basin water until such time <br />that the Board needs to fully utilize those rights to meet the demands of the citizens of Pueblo <br />and to satisfy contractual obligations. Long-term access to "if and when" storage would <br />increase the efficiency of the Board's water supply system, in the near term reduce the need for <br />transbasin diversions from the Colorado River basin, and assure that all diversions from the <br />western slope as well as the Board's east slope stored water is used efficiently. Unused water <br />by the Board would be subject to diversion by junior appropriators in the Colorado River basin <br />and may improve habitat for endangered fish. <br /> <br />Colorado Springs has indicated that if additional water conveyance pipelines or other facilities to <br />deliver water are not constructed, Colorado Springs Utilities (CSU) will not be capable of <br />meeting Colorado Spring's forecasted water demands by 2010. Lack of adequate water <br />supplies may contribute to disruption of community master planning efforts, limitations on <br />