Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00311.4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />AMONG THE SEVERAL INCLUSION O~DERS av THE BOARD IN FISCAL 1967 WERE THE INCLUSIONS <br /> <br />or THE TOWN or ESTES PARK AND TWO SUBDIVISION AREAS ADJAC~NT TO THE TOWN liMITS. <br /> <br />THESE. <br /> <br />AREAS ARE NOW ELIGIBLE. TO ACQuIRE DISTRICT WATER ALLOTMLNT CONTRACTS AND RECEIVE. WATE~ <br /> <br />OEL(VCRY SERViCe. BEFORE OELIVtR\ES CA~ at MAD~. HOwEVER~ OPERATING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN <br /> <br />THE DISTRICT AND THE WATER USERS INVOLVED MUST BE PREPARED AND EXECUTED. THESE CONTRACTS <br /> <br />WILL PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, FOR Y~AR-AROUND WATER DELIVERY SERVICE.; PAYMENT OF COSTS <br /> <br />FOR SPECIAL SERVICES TO BE. PROVIDED; AND PAYMENT or POWER lNTERFER~NCE ON ALL WATER DtLIV- <br /> <br />EREO. <br /> <br />THE 1965-1966 ANNUAL REPORT DiSCUSSED EFFORTS BY MANAGE~ENT AND LEGAL COUNSEL TO <br /> <br />STANDARDIZE AND SIMPLIFY DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR MAKING CHANGES IN WATeR ALLOTMENT CON- <br /> <br />TRACTS. <br /> <br />AT THE APRIL 1967 MEtTING, THE BOARD CARE~ULLY REVIEWED THE SuGGESTED NEW FOAMS <br /> <br />AND PROCEDURES AND ADOPTED A RESOLuTION TO IMPLEMENT THEIR USE. <br /> <br />THE MOST IMPORTANT CHANGE <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />WAS THE ADOPT '0/1.' oF" A SINGLE, APPLICATION FORM EI'lTITLE:D l1ApPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF CLASS 0 <br /> <br />ALLOTMENT CONTRACT. II THE NEW FORM REPLACES THE THREE FORMS FORMERLY USED FOR IlREALLOCATJON,1l <br /> <br />'lTRANSFER~" AND IIRELEAStn or ALLOTMENTS ATTACHED TO LAND. <br /> <br />OTHER CONTRACT FORMS AND ALLOTMENT <br /> <br />CHANGE PROCEDURES WERt ALSO AMENDED TO CLARIFY AND SIMPLlrY THE PROCESS OF CHANGING ALLOTMENT <br /> <br />CONTRACTS. <br /> <br />A SUPPLY OF" THE NEW FORMS. TOGETHER WITH EXPLANATION FOR THEIR USE, WAS MAILED TO ALL <br /> <br />ATTORNEYS WHO HAVE PRtV\OUSLY HANDLED ALLOTMENT CONTRACT CHANGES FOR THEJR CLIENTS, HOPE- <br /> <br />rULLY THE NEW rORMS, RULES, AND PROCEDURES WILL MAKE ALLOTMtNi CONTRACT CHANGES NOT ONLY <br /> <br />EASIER BuT ~ASTER AND LESS COSTLY TO THE CONCERNED ALLOTTEES. <br /> <br />IN JUNE, A TRIAL WAS HELD IN LARIMER COUNTY DIstRICT COURT INVOLVING THE INTENDED <br /> <br />TRANS~ER OF A DISTRICT WATER ALlOTMtNT CONTRACT. THE BOARD HAD AUTHORIZED D'STRICT LEGAL <br /> <br />COUNSEL TO INTERVtNE IN THE CASE IN ORDER TO PREC~uDE A COURT DECISION WHICH MIGHT PREJUDICE <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />THE DISTRICT's PROCEDURES ~OR HANDLING ALLOTMENT CONTRACTS. THROUGH TESTIMONY GIVEN AT THE <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-31 - <br />