My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09097
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:51:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8510.100.40
Description
Rio Grande Compact Commission
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1979
Title
San Luis Valley Water Problems: A Legal Perspective - Part I of II
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(Y') <br />L0 <br />.~ <br />"'''; <br />(:.;J <br />c.-:> <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />....-~'-.) <br /> <br />piration requirements began to raise the ground water table in the lower- <br /> <br />lying lands in the eastern and central parts of the Basin. The soils in <br />these areas eventually became waterlogged and were largely abandoned and <br />the irrigated farming activities moved continually west across the Valley <br />floor. Thus the lush wheat and oat fields were turned into salt flats, <br />while the excess water evaporated uselessly into the atmosphere. 16 <br />Many individual farmers attempted to drain these lands, but the farmers <br />in the eastern and central portion on the Basin found the magnitude and <br />expense of individual efforts overWhelming. Much discussion about the <br />problem ensued during the years, but nothinq concrete was done. <br />The drafters of the Rio Grande River Compact saw a use for the water. <br />Article III of the Compact envisioned the possible use of the excess <br />water in the Basin to fulfill Colorado's delivery commitments to New <br /> <br />Mexico, but certain water quality restrictions were also written into <br /> <br />the Compact. SUbsequently, the San Luis Valley Project, in conformity <br />with the provisions of Section 9 of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 <br />and as described in House Document 693, 76th Congress, Third Session, <br />was authori zed under a secretari a 1 findi ng of feas i bi 1 ity. <br />An expenditure of $500,000 was authorized for the construction of a <br /> <br />drain, but construction was contingent on a finding of both a justification <br />for .the drain on the basis of cost and on the basis of the quantity and <br />quality of water to be secured, and also contingent on the establishment <br />of adequate arrangements for the maintenance of the drain. 17 Following <br /> <br />16 <br />Hafen, Colorado and Its People, Vol. II, Lewis Historical Publishing <br />Company, (New York, 1943). <br /> <br />17A Report on Closed Basin Division, supra., p. 59. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.