Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f\:J <br />~ <br />.....t <br />OJ <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />collectively evaluate and rank the proposals, The ranking committee <br />representatives from the Federal Government and the Colorado River Basin <br />States (Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, California, Nevada, New Mexico, and <br />Arizona).. <br /> <br />Finally, Reclamation will attempt to negotiate the final terms of an <br />agreement with the highest ranked proponents, This agreement may be a <br />grant, cooperative agreement, or formal contract depending upon the <br />circumstances and judgment of the contracting officer, Negotiations may be <br />terminated if the final terms are not acceptable to Reclamation, <br /> <br />Reclamation will conduct a limited test ofthe ranking portion of the process <br />and award fiscal year (FY) 1996 funds, Funding commitments under this <br />test will be limited to available FY 1996 funds, No commitments will be <br />made for out-year funding until the full RFP process is completed later in <br />1996, Small projects will be selected from alternatives ready to implement <br />and that can be completed within theFY 1996 timeframe, This test will be <br />used to refine ranking procedures included in the RFP, AB appropriate, <br />supplemental guidance for implementing the program will be included in <br />future RFP's or in the progress reports to Congress required by P,L, 93-320, <br /> <br />vi <br />