Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"6(\" <br />... J J. <br /> <br />General Description <br /> <br />'. Subsequently, as a result of chronic water shortages, it <br />I became evident that most of the irrigation districts had over- <br />estimated the available water supplies and had overextended their <br />" service areas. <br /> <br />At the beginning of the severe drouth of the 1930's, these <br />water shortages became widespread} and many farmers developed <br />ground water for irrigation. As the drouth continued throughout <br />the 1930's, ground-water development in the South Platte River <br />Basin expanded rapidly. <br /> <br />However, it had been apparent for a considerable time that <br />additional surface water for irrigation would be re~uired--particu- <br />1arly in the upper portion of the basin. The only practicable means. <br />of resolving the situation was by transmountain importation of water <br />from headwater sources on the western side of the Continental Divide. <br />Accordingly, in 1935, the Public Works Administration granted funds <br />for a survey by the Bureau of Reclamation of what was called the <br />Grand Lake-Big Thompson project. The project was subsequently found <br />feasible by the Secretary of the Interior and was approved by the <br />President on December 21, 1937. Funds were included in the Interior <br />Department Appropriation Act of 1938 (50 Stat. 564) 595) for construc- <br />tion of the project in accordance with the plan described in Senate <br />Document No. 80 of the 75th Congress. Concurrently with the Federal <br />authorization of the project, the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy <br />District was formally organized in 1937 and entered into a contract <br />with the United States, through the Bureau of Reclamation, on July 5, <br />1938, for the repayment of project construction costs on what became <br />known as the Colorado-Big Thompson Project. <br /> <br />Most of the available Colorado-Big Thompson importations have <br />been used initially in the upper basin above the Narrows area. The <br />i lower basin--i.e., the Narrows service area--has benefitted from the <br />I use of return flows. However, most of the return flows, or their <br />e~uivalent, have been utilized by means of ground water withdrawals, <br />leaVing surface flows in the river about the same as before the <br />Colorado-Big Thompson Project return flows materialized. <br /> <br />v' <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />Thirty-three irrigation systems now serve lands within the Lower <br />South Platte Water Conservancy District. Four offstream reservoirs, <br />Jackson Lake, Prewitt, North Sterling, and Julesburg (JUlllbo), serve <br />about ten to twelve ditch systems in the Conservancy District. None <br />of these reservoirs has sufficient capacity to assure adequate supplies <br />for the systems served. The remainder of the ditch systems in the <br />conservancy district rely on streamflows for their major source of <br />supply. <br /> <br />vi <br /> <br />7 <br />