Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />o <br />en <br />w <br />o <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />4. Statistical analysis of un-ionized ammonia (NH3) concentrations <br /> <br />for low flow period Jul - Oct for all years of record; graphic <br />presentation as appropriate if it differs from (3). <br /> <br />To summarize, we propose: (1) to analyze 20 parameters at 18 stations <br />for the period of historic water quality records; (2) to determine his- <br />toric trends and to display present water quality conditions at all <br />stations; and (3) to perform a bit of additional analysis on un-ionized <br />ammonia because of its prominence as both a municipal and an industrial <br />pollutant, and because of the need to consider it in both an effluent <br />and an ambient water quality sense. <br /> <br />Published reports from state agencies and 208 planning agencies <br />will be used to interpret and analyze the data. A brief summary of <br />present water quality conditions will be presented in narrative form. <br /> <br />II. Projections of future water quality conditions. <br /> <br />Our methodology for analysis of future water quality conditions, <br />taking into account the projections of emerging energy technology <br />developments, is yet to be determined. We propose to hire a consul- <br />tant to aid in this portion of the l3(a) assessment. <br /> <br />SH <br />4/27/78 <br />