My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09067
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:50:57 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:26:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Correspondence-Other Organizations
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
7/1/1972
Author
USWRC
Title
US Water Resources Council - Proposed Principles and Standards - Summary Analysis
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00;)32::\ <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />"While the proposed planning standards document takes <br />into account the quality of the environment, we want to re- <br />emphasize the critical importance of giving priority treatment <br />to this factor. We are rapidly reaching a point in our society <br />where we can ill-afford to impose man-made structures on our <br />few remaining free-running streams. Nor can we afford to con- <br />tinue to channelize streams under the guise of flood control when, <br />in so doing, we simply move the potential flood waters downstream <br />to a different area while at the same time we flagrantly violate all <br />of the principles of sound fish and wildlife management and destroy <br />vital conservation values. <br /> <br />"With respect to giving greater weight to environmental <br />values, the National Wildlife Federation recommends that the <br />Water Resources Council give serious consideration to incor- <br />porating the concept of life-cycle planning in the planning process. <br />Life-cycle planning, . . . would require that any proposed water <br />resource plans specifically state and evaluate in quantitative <br />terms the environmental impact of the proposed project during <br />the planning, exploration, construction, operating and, if appro- <br />priate, the restoration stages. " <br /> <br />* )): * * * <br /> <br />"Unless and until much more overwhelming evidence can <br />be assembled than is presently available that the long-run <br />ecologic, hydrographic, and total environmental consequences <br />of constructing impoundments, levees, and straightening channels '~_' <br />and otherwise intervening in natural processes can yield on <br />balance net advantages over leaving these resources and water- <br />sheds in their natural state, economic analysis should consider <br />as one of the possible costs of constructing environmental <br />projects, the cost of eventually restoring the watershed or other <br />resources to its natural state." <br /> <br />***** <br /> <br />"In conclusion, . . . I would hope that concerned citizens <br />in all parts of this country will have ample opportunity under the <br />new standards to express their views and to make a vigorous <br />input in the planning of all water resources projects." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.